Senator "Ted" Cruz is wrong to continue his campaign while citizenship questions loom
Rafael Edward "Ted" Cruz is an American politician who is the junior U.S. Senator from Texas. He is a candidate for President of the United States in the 2016 presidential election. Wikipedia He was born in Calgary, Canada in 1970.
(My goodness, even "Ted" isn't his real name!!!)
Any candidate who's sincerely patriotic about being elected the leader of the free world would've had the question of citizenship settled before running for president. Not so with "Senator Ted Cruz to loose" the Senator from Texas who says he's the person voters should elect to be president. Yet, "Cruz to loose" has not completely resolved his eligibility as a "natural born citizen" as required in the US Constitution. Frankly, my opinion is that the place where "Cruz to loose" was born, as in "Canada" has little to do with his elibibility to be president. His problem is really credibility. In fact, "Cruz to loose" challenged President Obama's elibility to be president of the US, because the "certificate of live birth" issued in Hawaii where Barack Obama was born was not considered proof of citizenship.
"Cruz to loose" is an egotistical right wing politican. Regardless of how many hypocritcal situations he finds himself embroiled in, his response is to blame others (especially the media) rather than find a solution. He uses an entrenched fundamentalist, conservative base of followers to create political myths, like "birtherism"- claiming President Obama was not born in the US.
For some unexplainable reason, the Cruz talent is his skill to create truths from myths and he's able to attract "political lemmings" from among the zealots who believe him.
The National Journal reports:
by S.V. Dáte
Any candidate who's sincerely patriotic about being elected the leader of the free world would've had the question of citizenship settled before running for president. Not so with "Senator Ted Cruz to loose" the Senator from Texas who says he's the person voters should elect to be president. Yet, "Cruz to loose" has not completely resolved his eligibility as a "natural born citizen" as required in the US Constitution. Frankly, my opinion is that the place where "Cruz to loose" was born, as in "Canada" has little to do with his elibibility to be president. His problem is really credibility. In fact, "Cruz to loose" challenged President Obama's elibility to be president of the US, because the "certificate of live birth" issued in Hawaii where Barack Obama was born was not considered proof of citizenship.
"Cruz to loose" is an egotistical right wing politican. Regardless of how many hypocritcal situations he finds himself embroiled in, his response is to blame others (especially the media) rather than find a solution. He uses an entrenched fundamentalist, conservative base of followers to create political myths, like "birtherism"- claiming President Obama was not born in the US.
For some unexplainable reason, the Cruz talent is his skill to create truths from myths and he's able to attract "political lemmings" from among the zealots who believe him.
The National Journal reports:
by S.V. Dáte
Is Ted Cruz American Enough?
Out of all the people who hope to become president, only one would find it a complete waste of time to campaign in his hometown.
Ted Cruz’s Calgary, after all, is in the Canadian province of Alberta, which offers precisely zero electoral votes in a U.S. presidential election.
Former New Hampshire Republican Party Chairman Fergus Cullen acknowledges the irony: A party with a sizable faction that still questions the legitimacy of someone who actually was born in the United States now features among its best-financed candidates a man who, unquestionably, was not.
“I doubt that even 20 or 30 percent of primary voters are aware of that,” he said and then joked: “Clearly, Donald Trump needs to launch an investigation on this issue. He’d be the perfect person to do this.”
As it turns out, Trump — who four years ago vowed to get to the bottom of President Obama’s birth certificate and now is a candidate himself — is already on the case.
“He was born in Canada,” Trump told a New York TV stationwhen Cruz entered the race in March. “If you know and when we all studied our history lessons, you are supposed to be born in this country, so I just don’t know how the courts would rule on it. But it’s an additional hurdle that he has, that no one else seems to have.”
(More recently, with Cruz one of the few Republican candidates publicly defending Trump’s efforts to make illegal immigration a top issue, Trump’s campaign told National Journal that Trump is “not an elections law” expert and would not comment on Cruz.)
Cruz explains that because his mother was an American citizen when he was born, that satisfies the constitutional requirement that a president be a “natural born citizen.” On the day he announced his run, he told Fox News’ Sean Hannity: “As a legal matter, the issue is quite straightforward, that if you or I travel abroad and we have a child that’s born abroad, and we’re American citizens, that child is a natural born citizen.”
But what Supreme Court or federal-appeals court ruling can Cruz cite to back that up? Actually, none. There isn’t any, which is why, although Cruz has so far not faced any legal challenges since he entered the race, one leading expert says that is certain to change.
From Maine Writer- it seems like patriotic common sense to expect our candidates, who run for public office, especially for President of the USA, to be crystal clear about their qualfiications to run for the office they seek. Shame on Senator "Cruz to loose" for not resolving this issue before declaring his intention to run for President.
Regardless of the Cruz "natural born citizen" issue, the fact that he didn't bother to resolve this citizenship issue, especially after he made such a ridiculous brouhaha about "birtherism", makes him unqualified to be Preisdent.
Labels: birtherism, Calgary Canada, National Journal, Texas
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home