Republicans loose Veterans

Editorial:  Republicans' stance on the issues loose the support of veterans:

Republican leadership consistently attempted to repeal the Affordable Care Act, denying millions access to health care coverage...

Opinion echo published in the Virginia newspaper the 

Richmond Times Dispatch

Combat veteran and moderate Republican, Kevin Green* cannot support Republicans on key issues such as climate change, gun safety, health care and immigration, nor their current (DJT) leader, and it is past time for a change. 

In my opinion, the scientific evidence on climate change is overwhelming, yet the Republican Party leaders act like ostriches and bury their heads in the sand, trying to bring back coal and lower auto standards. I am not a Green New Deal fan, and I do think carbon fuels (such as natural gas) need to be a bridge to a better, cleaner tomorrow. But we need to act now!

On gun safety: Introducing background checks and eliminating assault weapons with high-capacity magazines are some steps we can take to start turning the tide.

On health care: Republican leadership has consistently attempted to repeal the Affordable Care Act, denying millions access to care. I am not for "Medicare for All," but we need a government option for those that need or want it, while retaining our employer-provided options.

On immigration: It takes labor and capital to create wealth. We need people, and not giving "Dreamers" a path to citizenship is a huge mistake and goes against our core values. When I factor these policy failures with the extremely poor example of leadership from the current White House and Senate Republicans, I feel compelled to speak out and look for a better solution, and that better solution is Mike Bloomberg.

Bloomberg is, without a doubt, the best moderate candidate who can beat Donald Trump in the general election. With his successful private and public leadership experience, he’ll act on key issues and restore faith in America around the world.

*Kevin Green, Glen Allen, Virginia.

Catholics and Evangelicals have little in common except ~ perhaps, loss of followers

The Guardian view on US religion: the Christian right is breaking up

Editorial ~ echo from The Guardian

MaineWriter: Roman Catholics that aligned with Evangelicals did so to develop political mass for the purpose of opposing abortion.  This political convenience is breaking up under Donald Trump's failed leadership, because Roman Catholics are decidedly in support of caring for refugees, asylum seekers and immigration reform allowing those who are in the US to seek a path to citizenship.  

The Guardian reports: The alliance between fundamentalist Protestants and Roman Catholics cannot survive the humiliations of evangelical support for Donald Trump

One of the most interesting and important developments in the American culture wars, which is to say in American politics and self-understanding, is playing out inside the major Christian groupings there: evangelical Christianity and Roman Catholicism. 

The Southern Baptist Convention, the largest fundamentalist grouping, has been roiled by the discovery of a sermon in which Paige Patterson, one of its leaders, boasts that he counselled an abused woman to stay with her husband even when she came to him with two black eyes. Almost 3,000 Southern Baptist women signed a letter demanding that the 75-year-old Mr Patterson lose his job as head of a seminary.

For the last 30 years, the alliance between Catholics and white evangelicals has been an enormously powerful force on the right of American politics.

Although the Alliance was not based upon religious doctrine, it was based around a common opposition to abortion – a cause to which evangelicals came relatively late – and a wider suspicion of feminism. Apart from that, the two groups have little in common demographically, culturally and even economically. The economic model of American evangelical Christianity has been fantastically successful, based around marketing, merchandising and vigorous competition between preachers for congregations. 

Nevertheless, when you adopt the methods of the entertainment industry, you will also imbibe some of its values. 

One result has been the growth of megachurches where the American flag is far more conspicuous than the cross; another is the growth of the “prosperity gospel”, which teaches that the rewards God wants for his followers are to be obtained in this world. The big names of that world, such as Paula White, the thrice-married woman who counsels Donald Trump, were reality stars before the Kardashians, showing off their wealth as evidence that God blessed them.

At the same time, the organised Catholic church has been ageing and shrinking. It has maintained a degree of intellectual prestige and self-confidence, but congregations have melted away, so that former Catholics could now form the third-largest religious grouping in the US. 

The scandal-battered clergy is split into liberal and conservative parties, both believing that they are more Catholic than the pope. 

Only an influx of Hispanic immigrants maintains the church on the ground. But this threatens any alliance with the white evangelical movement. That has become increasingly racist in the last 30 years.

Evangelicals have set their face against immigration, as it has against homosexuality and climate change. Donald Trump is forgiven all his lies and adulteries, because he so clearly stands for white supremacy. But when Trump loses power, the fundamentalists will, too. Their literally patriarchal attitudes to women have already lost the younger generation. Conservatives used to warn that liberals who married the spirit of the age would be left as widows. It is a historic irony that this will be the fate of American conservative Christianity.

Fact Checkers reading list- Romney lied

Although President Obama's supporters wished feverishly for a strong rebuttal to last evenings "lie-athon", the Romney theatrical performance, the fact is, we weren't faced with a morning news clip showing a "zinger" moment 

As a matter of fact, the morning pundits were the ones raising the truth issues, because they didn't have a potentially embarrassing moment to show, the kind that can live in infamy (although President Obama could have said to Romney, "there you go again- lying...). At least, the morning pundits were calling up the facts that Romney rolled over the American people, including the moderator Jim Lehrer.

People began sending me email messages right after the Presidential debate, asking what I would blog about? Well here’s the bottom line: Romney lied his way through the entire debate but President Obama didn’t call him on any facts. Nonetheless, style over substance, Romney bullied the President and debate moderator Jim Lehrer.


Here’s the recommended reading list to back me up, includes my post fact check blog written at midnight last evening.
Huffington Post:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/03/obama-economy_n_1936522.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003

Three from Los Angeles Times:

Romney repeats erroneous claims


http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-fact-check-romney-healthcare-20121003,0,5148610.story

Romney overstates jobs numbers, skews information

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-fact-check-debate-romney-unemployment-20121003,0,7773454.story

Julie's blog on Presidential Truthfulness Winning the Debate

http://oneturkeyrun.blogspot.com/2012/10/truthfulness-president-obama-won-debate.html