How much evidence does Attorney General Merrick Garland need?
Los Angeles Times echo opinion letter: It’s difficult, perhaps impossible, to find a president guilty of treason. (Until now!)
Sincerely asking! What, truly, is stopping Garland? The lack of evidence of a hysterical president’s guilt? I think not. The lack of a historical precedent? Other countries have ousted and tried their treasonous leaders.
America has always been a precedent setter. Isn’t it time to set one by trying to set this ex-president in prison?
Atty. Gen. Garland, please do your duty.
Saul Isler, Los Angeles
 |
| January 6, Select Committee hearing room in the US Capitol |
But, when will the Attorney General Merrick Garland indict the man who urged supporters to march on the U.S. Capitol — some carrying swords and pointed flagpoles and other weapons of mass treason — on Jan. 6, 2021? (“The Jan. 6 hearings identify the bad guy in the drama of democracy’s narrow escape — Trump,” Opinion, July 13)
Sincerely asking! What, truly, is stopping Garland? The lack of evidence of a hysterical president’s guilt? I think not. The lack of a historical precedent? Other countries have ousted and tried their treasonous leaders.
 |
| Overwhelming preponderance of evidence! |
America has always been a precedent setter. Isn’t it time to set one by trying to set this ex-president in prison?
Atty. Gen. Garland, please do your duty.
Saul Isler, Los Angeles
Labels: Los Angeles Times, Saul Isler
posted by Juliana L'Heureux | 4:41 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home