Maine Writer

Its about people and issues I care about.

My Photo
Name:
Location: Topsham, MAINE, United States

My blogs are dedicated to the issues I care about. Thank you to all who take the time to read something I've written.

Monday, May 18, 2026

Question to Donald Trump and maga cult Republicans? Has Iran surrendered yet?

In response to the letter “Trump ridding the world of Iranian nuclear threat” (May 7, TribLive), I object to the letter writer because I have a thought or two.
First, didn’t Donald Trump announce last June that military strikes had “obliterated” any Iranian nuclear threat If true, why strike again, this time after their leaders and civilians Obliterate defined is to “destroy completely.” I can’t imagine that Trump would ever lie to the American people, can you❓🤥😒I recall him promising no more foreign wars on the campaign trail.

Secondly, it would appear that Iran has handed Trump and Secretary Pete Hegseth (aka "Whiskey Pete") more problems than their genius strategy expected. Military experts warned them both of the response an attack would create. But, they ignored it and are now scrambling to win something that looks on the surface as an unlikely outcome. If the war is “won,” as Trump claims, then why is the Strait of Hormuz still closed, negotiation necessary and deals needed to be made? Thirteen service members have been killed and hundreds more wounded, and Iran is no closer to bowing to those two than the day of the first strikes. So much for a four- to six-week “military excursion.” Empty threats and boasts of victory are hollow words of weakness.

Finally, should Trump decide to “make Iran glow” - a major war crime, as he threatened, he will not only continue his path as being the worst president in modern history, he will be tried as a war criminal too. Is this entire mess what the letter writer is thanking God for
(Maine Writer- "War does not solve problems; on the contrary, it amplifies them and inflicts deep wounds on the history of peoples, which take generations to heal."- Pope Leo XIV)

Has Iran surrendered yet

From Howard Cade in Franklin, Pennsylvania




Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, March 17, 2026

Donald Trump and maga Republicans are to blame for tragic murder war crimes killing Iranian school children

US bombing of elementary Iranian school should make members of Congress sick 🤢— and make them investigate. The deliberate murder of school children is a heinous evil war crime. Echo editorial published in the Boston Globe with excerpts from WRAL News in North Caroline..
This kind of war crimes attack against innocent children can’t be brushed aside as just the unfortunate cost of war.

On Feb. 28, 2026, when the Donald Trump announced that the United States and Israel had launched their war against Iran. Tragically, the deadliest strike in terms of civilian casualties was on a girl’s elementary school in the town of Minab, Iran. The attack killed at least 175 people, most of whom were children.

In the immediate aftermath, neither Israel nor the United States took responsibility for the attack. 

But, a New York Times visual investigation found that the school appeared to be targeted by a precision strike and that the United States was the likely culprit.

And still, Donald Trump tried to pin blame on Iran. “In my opinion, based on what I’ve seen, that was done by Iran,” Trump told reporters. “We think it was done by Iran, because they’re very inaccurate with their munitions, they have no accuracy whatsoever, it was done by Iran.” (But recently released satellite images taken and published by a private company shows Iranians were successful using strategically targeted missile attacks.  
Satellite images are beginning to be released giving a glimpse into the toll of the Iran war, with ships ablaze in an Iranian port and destroyed buildings at an American base. - reports WRAL News., in North Carolina.  Information has been scarce about the damage being done across the Middle East, particularly when it’s inside closed military facilities, since the start of the war on Feb. 28. Amd major impact seen at 5th Fleet headquarters in Bahrain.  The island kingdom of Bahrain, home of the U.S. Navy’s 5th Fleet, saw heavy Iranian fire targeting both military bases and oil installations. A March 1st, image shot by Planet Labs shows a major building at the base destroyed, as well as two radomes — geodesic domes covering radar antennas — likely by Iranian missile and drone fire.

The Navy has not offered a clear breakdown about the damage done so far at the base, but Iran repeatedly claimed to have attacked it. Online videos also shows incoming fire targeting the base. 
During the 12-day war in June, Iran attacked and destroyed a similar radome at Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, used for secure communications.)

Among of the alarming findings that emerged in the aftermath of the strike on the Iranian children's school is that it could have been a result of outdated data. The school was adjacent to an Iranian naval base, which was the target of the US strikes that day. According to The New York Times, the school at one point was part of the naval base but has since at least 2016 been partitioned off

If that’s true, then why is the US military operating on information that’s at least a decade old

During the bombing campaign against what was then Yugoslavia in 1999, the United States accidentally bombed the Chinese embassy in Belgrade, killing three and creating an international uproar. Officials blamed that mishap on outdated maps — so why is that still a problem almost 30 years later?

There are also questions about whether artificial intelligence played a role in the deadly strike.

Congress can maximize pressure on the Trump administration to provide answers by using the power of the purse. It’s expected that the White House will require supplemental funding for the war — at least an additional $50 billion — and lawmakers should pause before considering such requests. They should demand answers and ensure that the Trump administration doesn’t stonewall any investigations and that taxpayer money isn’t spent funding operations that result in deadly attacks like the tragic one on the elementary school.

Getting to the bottom of this should not be a partisan issue. Republicans have also expressed their concerns about the strike on the school. “I think it was a horrible, horrible mistake,” Republican Senator John Kennedy, of Louisiana, said. “And when you make a mistake, you ought to admit it.”

Republicans need to work with Democrats to get the answers. After all, even if Republican lawmakers fully support Trump’s decision to go to war with Iran, it is still their responsibility to ensure that the United States is accurate and precise in targeting enemy combatants, not innocent civilians, let alone children. If this strike highlights something systemically wrong with the Pentagon’s operations, that would make clear that the longer this war lasts, the more likely it is that strikes like the one on the elementary school could happen again. For supporters of the war, that’s not only a moral stain but also a strategic blunder that would only strengthen popular support for the Iranian regime and further exacerbate anti-Western sentiments. And without Republican leadership, neither Congress nor the public will get the answers needed from the White House.

This is also an opportunity to review the Pentagon’s standards and procedures, especially under Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth (Whiskey Pete
💢🤢). 

Since Hegseth took this role, he has been boasting about US military strength and adamantly arguing that the United States should be less cautious when it comes to considering standard rules of engagement and international law. When Trump rebranded the Department of Defense into the Department of War, Hegseth insisted that the Pentagon will focus on “maximum lethality, not tepid legality. Violent effect, not politically correct.”

It’s worth digging into whether standards under Hegseth have indeed been lowered, and if so to what degree. It’s already been reported that he gutted the offices that would have been tasked with probing situations like the strike on the elementary school. What else has happened under Hegseth that could minimize accountability and potentially make strikes like this one all the more likely in the future


This is also an opportunity to review the Pentagon’s standards and procedures, especially under Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. 

Since Hegseth took this role, he has been boasting about US military strength and adamantly arguing that the United States should be less cautious when it comes to considering standard rules of engagement and international law. When Trump rebranded the Department of Defense into the Department of War, Hegseth insisted that the Pentagon will focus on “maximum lethality, not tepid legality. Violent effect, not politically correct.”

It’s worth digging into whether standards under Hegseth have indeed been lowered, and if so to what degree. It’s already been reported that he gutted the offices that would have been tasked with probing situations like the strike on the elementary school. 

What else has happened under Hegseth that could minimize accountability and potentially make strikes like this one all the more likely in the future

Those are just some of the issues Congress should be investigating. And when lawmakers get answers, they must share them with the public. We might be at war, but we should still hold the Pentagon to the highest of standards. (After all, Hegseth is wastefully spending our hard earned tax💲 money 💰)

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, March 11, 2026

Donald Trump and maga Republicans must call the Iran war what it is- World War III in Iran caused by inept Trumpism

Let’s begin by stating the obvious: Trump is at war with Iran.

Echo opinion published in the Los Angeles Times by Jonah Goldberg.
What is my evidence
Turn on your TV. U.S. forces, working with Israel, killed the supreme leader of Iran and many of his top aides. We sunk Iran’s navy and destroyed most of their air force. We bombed thousands of military sites across the region. President Trump, the commander in chief, has demanded “unconditional surrender” from Iran. He routinely refers to this as a “war.” Pete Hegseth,
🤢who calls himself the secretary of war, also describes this as a war daily, such as last week when he said, “We set the terms of this war.”

The truth that we are at war is so simple, only politicians and lawyers could make it seem complicated.

Indeed, a slew of Republican legislators insist we’re not actually at war. House Speaker Mike Johnson: “We’re not at war right now. We’re four days into a very specific, clear mission and operation.” Florida Rep. Brian Mast: “Nobody should classify this as war. It is combat operations.” South Carolina Sen. Lindsay Graham: “I don’t know if this is technically a war.” Oklahoma Sen. Markwayne Mullin: “This isn’t a war. We haven’t declared war.” Florida Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: “Strategic strikes are not war.”

Pearl Harbor was a strategic strike too.

Then there’s the claim that we’re not at war with Iran but Iran is at war with us. This is half true, insofar as Iran has been committing acts of war against the U.S. since it took our embassy staff hostage in 1979. But waging a war in response doesn’t make it any less of a war.

One is tempted to invoke George Orwell’s “1984,” in which the existence or nonexistence so
 literary is at play. This is (mostly) legalism run amok.

The main reason congressional Republicans reject the W-word is simple. If it’s merely a “combat operation” or “strategic strike” in response to an “imminent threat,” then the president has the authority to do it without congressional approval. If it’s a war, then it’s arguably illegal and unconstitutional within the framework of the War Powers Resolution or the Constitution itself, because under the Constitution declaring war is the sole responsibility of Congress. And the last thing this Congress wants to do is take responsibility for anything.

This at least partly explains why Trump insists he had a “feeling” Iran was about to attack us. He has even suggested that Iran was just weeks away from having a nuclear weapon and that he prevented an imminent “nuclear war.”

The War Powers Resolution — nominally rejected by every president since it was passed in 1973 — was intended to restrict the president’s ability to use force without Congress’ consent. It backfired. It says the president can respond militarily to threats as he deems necessary, but then must go to Congress within 60 days for approval to continue hostilities. The result: Presidents have a free hand to wage war for roughly two months, unless Congress stops them.

But congressional Republicans don’t want to stop Trump. That’s tactically defensible, if you believe this war was necessary. But the tactic forces Congress to say, in effect, “Don’t believe you’re lying eyes. This isn’t a war.”


For those who only vaguely remember what they learned in high school about the War Powers Resolution — or for that matter, the Constitution — this riot of legalism only fuels confusion.

But, there’s another factor driving the evasion. Trump made the idea of staying out of “forever wars” a central tenet of America First. There’s no textbook definition of “forever war” — always a ludicrous term — so you can understand why some people believed it was code for “Middle East war” or just plain war of any kind. 

Moreover, the irony is that Trump could make a plausible case that this war is allowable under the Authorization to Use Military Force George W. Bush received in 2001. But symbolically, that would mean Trump is continuing Bush’s “forever war.”

Regardless, Republicans aren’t just under a legal clock to get this thing over with, but a political one too. Polling shows that Americans, including many Republicans, have no thirst for a long conflict, which makes sense given that they were not asked to prepare for this war at all. Hence, the insistence that this war will be short and tidy.

The problem is that Iran knows this. Which is why they don’t have to win, they just have to ride out the bombings until the public or Trump loses patience with this very real war.

X: @JonahDispatch


Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, February 28, 2026

Donald Trump violates the Constitution yet again launches illegal war against Iran but Republicans have their fingers up their asses

Donald Trump’s Attack on Iran Is Reckless


Echo editorial published in The New York Times editorial:

In his 2024, presidential campaign, Donald Trump promised voters that he would end wars, not start them. Over the past year, he has instead ordered military strikes in seven nations. His appetite for military intervention grows with the eating.

Now he has ordered a new attack against the Islamic Republic of Iran, in cooperation with Israel, and Trump said it would be much more extensive than the targeted bombing of nuclear facilities in June. Yet, he started this war without explaining to the American people and the world why he was doing so. 


Nor has he involved Congress, which the Constitution grants the sole power to declare war. He instead posted a video at 2:30 a.m. Eastern on Saturday, shortly after bombing began, in which he said that Iran presented “imminent threats” and called for the overthrow of its government. His rationale is dubious, and making his case by video in the middle of the night is unacceptable.

Among his justifications is the elimination of Iran’s nuclear program, which is a worthy goal. But Mr. Trump declared that program “obliterated” by the strike in June, a claim belied by both U.S. intelligence and this new attack. The contradiction underscores how little regard he has for his duty to tell the truth when committing American armed forces to battle. It also shows how little faith American citizens should place in his assurances about the goals and results of his growing list of military adventures.

Trump’s approach to Iran is reckless. His goals are ill-defined. Trump failed to line up the international and domestic support that would be necessary to maximize the chances of a successful outcome. He disregarded both domestic and international law for warfare.

The Iranian regime, to be clear, deserves no sympathy. It has wrought misery since its revolution 47 years ago — on its own people, on its neighbors and around the world. It massacred thousands of protesters this year. It imprisons and executes political dissidents. It oppresses women, L.G.B.T.Q. people and religious minorities. Its leaders have impoverished their own citizens while corruptly enriching themselves. They have proclaimed “Death to America” since coming to power and killed hundreds of U.S. service members in the region, as well as bankrolled terrorism that has killed civilians in the Middle East and as far away as Argentina.


Iran’s government presents a distinct threat because it combines this murderous ideology with nuclear ambitions. Iran repeatedly defied international inspectors over the years. Since the June attack, the government has shown signs of restarting its pursuit of nuclear weapons technology. American presidents of both parties have rightly made a commitment to prevent Tehran from getting a bomb.

We recognize that fulfilling this commitment could justify military action at some point. For one thing, the consequences of allowing Iran to follow the path of North Korea — and acquire nuclear weapons after years of exploiting international patience — are too great. For another, the costs of confronting Iran over its nuclear program look less imposing than they once did.

Iran, as David Sanger of The Times recently explained, “is going through a period of remarkable military, economic and political weakness.” Since the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks, Israel has reduced the threats from Hamas and Hezbollah (two of Iran’s terrorist proxies), attacked Iran directly and, with help from allies, mostly repelled its response. The new recognition of Iran’s limitations helped give rebels in Syria the confidence to march on Damascus and oust the horrific Assad regime, a longtime Iranian ally. Iran’s government did almost nothing to intervene. This recent history demonstrates that military action, for all its awful costs, can have positive consequences.

A responsible American president could make a plausible argument for further action against Iran. The core of this argument would need to be a clear explanation about the strategy, as well as the justification for attacking now, even though Iran does not appear close to having a nuclear weapon. This strategy would involve a promise to seek approval from Congress and to collaborate with international allies.


Trump is not even attempting this (professionally responsible) approach. Instead, Trump is telling the American people and the world that he expects their blind trust. He has not earned that trust.

He instead treats allies with disdain. He lies constantly, including about the results of the June attack on Iran. He has failed to live up to his own promises for solving other crises in Ukraine, Gaza and Venezuela. He has fired senior military leaders for failing to show fealty to his political whims. When his appointees make outrageous mistakes — such as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth 🤢
 sharing advanced details of a military attack on the Houthis, an Iranian-backed group, on an unsecured group chat — Trump shields them from accountability. His administration appears to have violated international law by, among other things, disguising a military plane as a civilian plane and shooting two defenseless sailors who survived an initial attack.

A responsible approach would also involve a detailed conversation with the American people about the risks. Iran remains a heavily militarized country. Its medium-range missiles may have failed to do much damage to Israel last year, but it maintains many short-range missiles that could overwhelm any defense system and hit Saudi Arabia, Qatar and other nearby countries. Mr. Trump did acknowledge this in his overnight video, saying, “The lives of courageous American heroes may be lost and we may have casualties.”

He should have had the courage to say so in his State of the Union address on Tuesday, among other settings. When a president asks American troops and diplomats to risk their lives, he should not be coy about it.

Recognizing Trump’s irresponsibility, some members of Congress have taken steps to constrain him on Iran. In the House, Representatives Ro Khanna, Democrat of California, and Thomas Massie, Republican of Kentucky, have proposed a resolution meant to prevent Trump from starting a war without congressional approval. The resolution makes clear that Congress has not authorized an attack on Iran and demands the withdrawal of American troops within 60 days. 


Senator Tim Kaine, 😇Democrat of Virginia, and Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, are sponsoring a similar measure in their chamber. The start of hostilities should not dissuade legislators from passing these bills. A robust assertion of authority by Congress is the best way to constrain Donald Trump.  #ImpeachTrumpNOW 

Labels: , , , , , ,

Tuesday, December 23, 2025

Donald Trump and maga Republicans must show compassion for those who are deliberately being victimized without cause

I agree with much in Colin Pascal’s Dec. 22, 2025, commentary, “Why the White House Faith Office is failing.*” (See the essay below this opinion letter.)

However, what is really needed is the “White House Compassion Office.”

Religious faith, as Mr. Pascal points out, does not guarantee adherence to a moral life or prevent shameful behavior. 
"'Do Unto Others', officially titled The Golden Rule, is a famous 1961, painting for The Saturday Evening Post showing diverse people of different races, religions and cultures united by the principle of treating others as you wish to be treated. The painting reflects Rockwell's desire for world unity."

Many people who practice non-Christian religions, or who profess no religious affiliation or no belief in a divinity, practice moral lives because of a belief not in an afterlife, but in the Golden Rule and a conviction that what we do to lift up one of us lifts up all of us. I do not want to live in a “Christian” nation, but rather in a tolerant, compassionate nation that recognizes that all who choose to live here possess inalienable rights that need to be respected and protected.

From Anne O’Hare, in Baltimore, Maryland

*Donald Trump’s White House Faith Office was established earlier this year (2025) and is a welcome addition to a Washington bureaucracy that sometimes seems hostile to religion.

Actually, the office seeks to ensure that faith leaders have a voice in policy and that religious organizations are treated fairly by the government. Despite its establishment, the office is failing to halt the widespread decline of religious faith in America. A Gallup poll recently found that less than half of Americans now identify as religious. The administration’s own behavior is partly to blame.

The history of religion in political life is complicated, and faith in America hasn’t always been a pure force for good. At St. Anne’s Episcopal Church in Annapolis, where I worship on Sundays and serve on the vestry, we take pride in the work of
William Wilberforce (b.1759-d.1883), a 19th-century English parliamentarian who shared our Anglican tradition.

Wilberforce was largely responsible for ending the trans-Atlantic slave trade, an immense service to humanity that was inspired by his Christian faith. His work is part of our church’s proud legacy of service, but there are shameful parts of our history as well. Two plaques, one on the interior and one on the exterior of our church, commemorate the African-American slaves who played a part in constructing the building in which we worship. The plaques also acknowledge that two Episcopal churches founded in Annapolis by St. Anne’s, St. Luke’s and St. Philips, only exist because an earlier generation of St. Anne’s parishioners wouldn’t share their sanctuary with African Americans. Given this history, it’s clear that the American church too often condoned the immoral. For all its modern and historical failures, however, religion remains a force for good.

Faith holds at bay the arrogance and self-importance that now define our cultural and political life. It reminds us that regardless of our position or title, we remain nothing more than a small part of God’s immense creation. By showing us our proper place in the world, faith, when well-practiced, encourages humility and dampens our judgment since each of us is flawed when compared to God’s perfection. Like everything good in the world, faith can be co-opted and has a downside, at times creating its own type of arrogance and exclusion. Acknowledging this isn’t a reason to push faith out of public life, and in general, faith does more than anything to keep us grounded.

If faith at its best encourages introspection, humility and compassion, then the White House Faith Office is failing. Too many of our leaders don’t seem to recognize that being seen as tough doesn’t mean dehumanizing people or being cruel. Attacking boats suspected of smuggling drugs may be justified to protect the lives of Americans, but there’s no way to justify making light of the associated killing. America used to honor the image of the reluctant warrior, seeing in the depiction of a fighter who wishes fighting wasn’t necessary something good in our national character. The (evil) playful way the administration appproaches these boat strikes feels distant from that older ideal.

Americans have always been ready to do hard and unpleasant things, but the willingness to do what’s necessary is a far cry from celebrating violence. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth strayed from the image of the reluctant warrior when he co-opted an ugly children’s book about Franklin the Turtle and posted an image of the main character shooting boats and smiling as they burned. If it were operating effectively the White House Faith Office would help the secretary understand that the people on these boats were made in God’s image and have a soul. Their bad decisions, perhaps informed by desperation, might make them legitimate targets, but taking their lives should always be a somber affair.

Secretary Hegseth isn’t the only figure in the administration whose behavior is difficult to square with traditional ideas of faith. President Donald Trump’s reaction to the murder of Rob and Michele Reiner, denigrating their memory and critiquing their politics, is a far cry from loving his enemies and reflecting God’s grace. The president’s embrace of concepts that don’t sit well with faith, promising his supporters that he would be their retribution and saying at Charlie Kirk’s funeral that he hates his opponents, is far removed from the lessons that many Americans learned in Sunday school. 

Although Donald Trump attempted to do something good when he established the White House Faith Office, his actions since he created it undermines its purpose. Moreover, hypocritically, Trump makes its existence mostly meaningless.

Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem’s decision in March to post a video of herself in front of half-naked men in an overcrowded prison was a sad example of using people as props. Many of the prisoners in El Salvador’s Terrorist Confinement Center are criminals who terrorized their neighbors and don’t deserve to be free. Their crimes, however, don’t lessen the tragedy of their situation, or the heartbreaking reality that these people, gifted by God with a soul, fell so far and did so much harm that they need to be incarcerated.

When leaders who claim to want a bigger role for religion in public life speak comfortably about retribution and hate, when they use a children’s cartoon character to make light of killing, and when they use prisoners as the backdrop for social media, something seems off in their understanding of faith. Keeping Americans safe may sometimes require the measured use of violence, and holding people in prison is a sad but necessary manifestation of the human condition. From immigration enforcement to counterdrug operations, key members of the administration seem to be enjoying themselves. Given the gravity of the topics and the effect of their actions on human lives, that reaction feels wrong.


The White House Faith Office exists in part to increase the role of religion in American life. That’s a controversial objective that might find more support if Americans could see the positive impact that faith can have on our public life. Until the Faith Office generates the influence and the will to change the administration’s rhetoric and aspects of its behavior, it won’t be taken seriously by an increasingly secular public that’s already skeptical of religion. Contrary to the views expressed by members of the current administration, many people of faith don’t believe that God blessed our nation only to see it turn its back on the world and deny the humanity that exists in everyone, humanity put there by God’s design.

Colin Pascal (colinjpascal@outlook.com) is a retired Army lieutenant colonel and a graduate student in the School of Public Affairs at American University. He lives in Annapolis.

Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, December 06, 2025

Donald Trump and maga Republicans must support the advice from military JAG officers to prevent war crimes and murder sof non-combatants

Echo opinion published in the Los Angeles Times by Jackie Calmes. 
At least Donald Trump didn’t “kill all the lawyers” first, literally following Shakespeare’s words in “Henry VI, Part 2” on evading the rule of law. Instead, just a month into his second term in February, he and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth simply fired the top lawyers at the Army, Navy and Air Force, known as judge advocates general, or JAGs.

“It’s what you do when you’re planning to break the law: You get rid of any lawyers who might try to slow you down,” Georgetown Law professor Rosa Brooks said at the time, according to The New York Times. She wasn’t alone in her fear, or her prescience.

Nine months later, the storylines embroiling Trump are getting all tangled up, creating a knotty mess of lawlessness, hypocrisy and potential war crimes in what conservative columnist George Will has dubbed “this moral slum of an administration.” And that owes at least in part to the fact that the president has gotten rid of good lawyers and other guardrails so he can act with impunity.

Over the Thanksgiving weekend, Americans got news of two utterly contradictory actions that grotesquely captured Trump’s amoral and immoral instincts — one involving killings, the other a presidential pardon.

First, the Washington Post disclosed a chilling twist on a September 2, 2025 attack that was the first of 21 known U.S. military strikes so far on small boats allegedly hauling drugs, the opening of Trump’s undeclared war on so-called narco-terrorists. 

In fact, the commander for the operation, reportedly following Hegseth’s verbal order to “kill them all,” ordered a second strike when two of 11 men on board were seen alive, clinging to wreckage. At least 72 other humans have since been blown up on vessels in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific.

The nonprofit news site the Intercept had first reported the September 2, episode just over a week later, but its report was little noted at the time. 

Subsequently, on Saturday, following the Post report and CNN’s confirmation, former military lawyers in a shadow watchdog group formed after the Pentagon purge in February released a five-page legal analysis stating that it “unanimously considers both the giving and the execution of these orders, if true, to constitute war crimes, murder, or both,” punishable by U.S. and international courts.

Prosecution could extend from Hegseth “down to the individual who pulled the trigger,” the Former JAGs Working Group said.

For all their tough-guy bravado, both Hegseth and Trump (definitely not a Trumanesque “the buck stops here” sort of president) have been trying mightily to distance themselves from the imbroglio, while each man insists the strikes were lawful. “I don’t know anything about it,” the commander in chief told reporters on Air Force One on Sunday, returning from his holiday golf break. But, he added, “I wouldn’t have wanted … a second strike.”

The designated fall guy seems to be Adm. Frank M. “Mitch” Bradley, who led the Joint Special Operations Command and ordered SEAL Team 6 to fire a second strike. Trump and Hegseth have repeatedly pointed to him, even as they insist they have his back. People at the Pentagon reportedly aren’t reassured.

Trump is using the controversy, meanwhile, to brag about his victories against drug traffickers, despite offering no public evidence that the dead men in those tiny boats were drug runners. 

Yet, his boasts couldn’t be more dissonant with the weekend’s other Trump-related news: the president’s celebratory announcement on social media that he would pardon a proven, big-time drug-trafficker, former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández.

Against Hernández there was heaps of evidence, enough to convict him in a U.S. federal court last year on charges of running his country as a narco-state, taking bribes and putting his police and military in league with drug cartels to funnel more than 400 tons of cocaine into the United States. To “stuff the drugs up the gringos’ noses,” he said, according to trial testimony.

Trump made good on the pardon this week — perhaps his greatest abuse of that presidential power in a long line of them, other than the January 6, pardons. Hernández was freed on Tuesday from prison.

Why would Trump do it? Because he could. There is no one to stop him. Both as a matter of justice and politics, this pardon is all but inexplicable. Sometimes there’s just no explaining the madness of Trump as anything other than that.

Quizzed by reporters, Trump gave his go-to explanation for pardoning the undeserving: The case, like his own in past years, “was a Biden administration set-up.” Never mind that the investigation of Hernández began in Trump’s first term. Or that the federal judge in his trial was a Bush appointee, P. Kevin Castel, who went on at length before sentencing Hernández — to 45 years — about the justice of the case.

Then there’s the third storyline snarled in the one about Trump’s killings in international waters: his campaign against six Democratic lawmakers, all military or intelligence veterans, who made a video last month telling U.S. service members that they should not — must not — obey illegal orders. “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH,” Trump thundered, though the Democrats were stating the law and military code. Hegseth, dutiful lapdog, directed the Navy to investigate one Democrat, Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona, for “serious allegations of misconduct.”

The alleged strike against survivors, on top of Trump’s general policy of lethal force against purported drug runners, underscores exactly why the Democrats spoke out. What’s more, they did so a month after Adm. Alvin Holsey, head of the U.S. Southern Command, announced his exit amid reports that he was forced out for objecting to the sea strikes.

Here’s the good news: Even senior Republicans in Congress have been roused to object. The public MUST act as well: to pull another “Epstein files” maneuver, creating so much pressure that Congress can’t back down from oversight hearings. In other words, bring in the lawyers. 

Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, October 26, 2025

Donald Trump and maga Republicans must end murdering people on the high seas especially when the Coast Guard is trained to intercede

An echo opinion published in the New York Magazine Intelligencer

Trump Wants to ‘Kill People’ Without War By Ed Kilgore, political columnist for Intelligencer since 2015.
Pete Hegseth confirms the killing.

In response to press questions about his administration’s escalating attacks on fishing boats (without proof of cause) in the Caribbean and the Pacific that were allegedly involved in drug trafficking, Donald Trump drew a rather jarring distinction, as CNN reports:

Trump insisted that he could continue to launch strikes against alleged drug traffickers without Congress first passing an official declaration of war. “I’m not going to necessarily ask for a declaration of war,” he said. “I think we’re just going to kill people that are bringing drugs into our country. Okay? We’re going to kill them, you know, they’re going to be, like, dead.”

It’s clear that Trump’s intention was to rule out any congressional interference with his constitutionally dubious use of military force in a struggle — don’t say war! — with so-called “narco-terrorists.” 

But, the line he drew between “war” and “killing” revealed a more fundamental element of his thinking. There has always been a bit of a contradiction between Trump’s horror toward “forever wars” — not to mention his aspirations as a global peacemaker — and his more general bloodlust. He wants America’s enemies and rivals to have no doubt about his willingness to unleash incredible levels of violence if he deems it necessary. He has dismissed laws of warfare that protect civilians or prohibit the torture of potential informants. He has appointed a “secretary of war” who believes “lethality” must be central to every national-security calculation. And in all sorts of contexts, he’s rejected any restraints on retribution against anyone who crosses him.

What this apparent disconnect between aversion to war and pure enjoyment of violence shows is that Trump remains a faithful disciple of the Jacksonian tradition in American foreign policy. Like Old Hickory, Trump rejects alliances, entanglements, or commitments to deploy military force, but at the same time believes use of maximum violence to eliminate any direct threat to perceived American interests is essential to maintaining the peace and deterring bad actors.


Trump wants a huge military that is so feared that it rarely needs to be used, and he hates the idea of limited “forever” wars that don’t instantly achieve their purposes. That probably includes any armed conflict that would last long enough to require congressional authorization or oversight. 

So Trump has no problems with, and in fact glories in, killing people as the best possible guarantor of an America-friendly world order based on fear rather than messy treaties and rules. Sudden strikes on fishing boats that may or may not be engaged in “narco-terrorism” are right in his wheelhouse. The message to a dangerous world is Don’t tread on me 🐍— or get yourself killed. It’s chilling but entirely in character for the 47th cruel president.

P.S. Maine Writer- Donald Trump, with maga Evangelicals like Speker Mike Johnson claim to be Christian but the Bible is very clear in the Ten Commandments, "Thou Shalt Not Kill".  The commandment "Thou shalt not kill" (Exodus 20:13) is more accurately translated as "Thou shalt not murder," and it prohibits the unjust taking of a human life. The Hebrew word used, ratsach, specifically refers to wrongful homicide.

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, October 17, 2025

Donald Trump and maga Republicans took an oath to support the Constitution but instead their loyalty is to power

Althuogh this Boston Globe editorial is dated on January 19, 2025, the fact is, the opinion is prophetic.  Donald Trump and his maga Republicans continue to support an incompetent administrataion, His stupid apointees are more focused on keeping their power, and experssing loyalty to Donald Trump, than they are about upholding their Constitutional oaths. 


From the moment he rode down that golden escalator in Trump Tower nearly a decade ago, Donald J. Trump reshaped the nation’s politics — and continues to do so today, with his hodgepodge of Cabinet picks that includes billionaires and media darlings, eccentrics, and rhetorical bomb-throwers.

Even in introducing — and supporting — Defense Secretary nominee Pete Hegseth at his confirmation hearing, Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker conceded, “The nominee is unconventional.”

Unconventional isn’t always a bad thing and presidents are generally given wide latitude to choose like-minded candidates for their Cabinet and their closest advisers.

But those Cabinet members and advisers serve the nation too. 

Some are, after all, in the Donald Trump line of succession should the president and vice president be unable to serve. So while Trump has sometimes treated the process cavalierly (who can forget the now thankfully aborted nomination of the disreputable Matt Gaetz as attorney general), (ugh🤢 )- he subsequently withdrew due to scandals about having sex with minors.... the US Senate does not have that luxury.

In the Senate, more than a dozen of Donald Trump's nominees were scheduled for their respective confirmation hearings.

Two of the nominees — those admittedly in the more conventional category — will deservedly win swift and likely bipartisan approval:

Senator Marco Rubio, nominated to be secretary of state, is the son of Cuban immigrants. His experience as vice chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and a member of the Committee on Foreign Relations provide him a solid background in international affairs.

Scott Bessent, a billionaire money manager from South Carolina, should provide a steady hand as Treasury secretary. He’s an advocate for deficit reduction and deregulation and would be the first openly gay nominee to that post.

Other nominees remain so far out of the mainstream and are so utterly unqualified for the critical posts to which they have been nominated that they represent an insult to the nation and are embarrassments to Senate Republicans on whose support their future rests.  (Senator Susan Collins of Maine ALERT
❗ She voted to approve RFKjr~❗)


Pete Hegseth’s chief qualification for running the Pentagon — with its $850 billion budget and more than 3 million uniformed and civilian personnel — seems to be his frequent appearances on Fox (FAKE❗ ) News. The Army National Guard veteran has opposed a role for women in combat, wants to bring an end to any Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs in the military, and in his book questioned whether the United States should continue to abide by the Geneva Convention. He vowed at his hearing to “restore the Warrior Ethos to the Pentagon.” He also now insists that “women will have access to ground combat roles,” causing Senator Elizabeth Warren to remark, “I’ve heard of deathbed conversions but this is the first time I’ve heard of a nomination conversion.”


Hegseth has also been accused of excessive drinking, including on the job, and womanizing. He fathered a child with the woman who would become wife number three, while still married to wife number two, at the same time he was accused of sexual assault by yet another woman, a case resolved with an out-of-court settlement and a nondisclosure agreement.

“I have not been a perfect person, but I have been redeemed,” he testified.

Russell Vought, Trump’s pick to head the Office of Management and Budget, signaled at his hearing that the incoming administration could again withhold congressional-approved funding for Ukraine and more — despite federal law barring the president from unilaterally blocking appropriated funding. During his first term, when Vought headed OMB, Trump blocked funds appropriated to assist Ukraine — a move that a federal watchdog concluded was illegal.

“He believes it’s unconstitutional,” Vought said of Trump’s view of the law. “For 200 years, presidents had the ability to spend less than an appropriation if they could do it for less.”




Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut noted that the Supreme Court declared the law constitutional four decades ago.

“I am astonished and aghast that someone in this responsible a position would, in effect, say that the president is above the law and that the United States Supreme Court is entitled to their opinion, but mine should supersede it,” Blumenthal said. “It’s just baffling that we are in this unprecedented moment in the history of this country.”

Not yet scheduled for his hearing is Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Trump’s nominee to head the Department of Health and Human Services. 

A long-time (crazy 😒😜) vaccine skeptic, Kennedy would be in charge of the federal agency responsible not just for vaccines and medications, but also agencies that fund medical research and are charged with responding to public health emergencies and epidemics. More than 75 Nobel Prize winners signed a letter opposing his confirmation saying he “would put the public’s health in jeopardy and undermine America’s global leadership in the health sciences.” Kennedy has also been an opponent of drinking water fluoridation. His flip-flopping on abortion has managed to alienate those on both sides of the debate. And then there are the personal incidents — from the babysitter who made allegations of sexual harassment to the dead bear cub he admits to leaving in Central Park and the dead whale head he collected off a Cape Cod beach.

The director of National Intelligence is a position so critical to the nation’s security — a post that so obviously should be beyond politics — that its current occupant, Avril Haines, was confirmed by the Senate on Inauguration Day in 2021 by an 84-10 vote. Trump’s nominee, former Democratic Representative Tulsi Gabbard, however, brings far more baggage than she does qualifications, delaying the scheduling of her hearing.


Now a MAGA devotee, Gabbard had a history of being rather fond of such dictators as Syria’s now deposed Bashar al-Assad, with whom she met in Syria in 2017, and Russia’s Vladimir Putin. She blamed NATO for Putin’s invasion of Ukraine and spread the Russian-invented claim that Ukraine was hosting US-funded labs working at creating bioweapons. She’s also a fan of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden, now living in Russia, both of whom are accused of leaking classified information. She has proposed pardoning Snowden.

With friends like Gabbard, as the saying goes, the US doesn’t need enemies.

In a sane and rational atmosphere, Gabbard and Kennedy wouldn’t even make it to the hearing stage, suffering the same fate as Gaetz. But Trump and his closest Republican allies have made the most of their ultimate weapon — promising to primary anyone opposing the president-elect’s nominees. In the case of Senator Joni Ernst, a respected military veteran herself, who now supports the confirmation of Hegseth, it seems to have worked.

That’s not simply shameful, it’s both dangerous and potentially tragic. And if things turn tragic, the American people will know who to blame.

Editorials represent the views of the Boston Globe Editorial Board. Follow us @GlobeOpinion.

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, July 31, 2025

Donald Trump and maga Republicans shoving Project 2025 down American's throats and the side effects are nauseating

Donald Trump  lies about virtually everything and he lied to voters about the deeply unpopular Project 2025, but Americans are now living under the horror of this plan in real time. 🤥 The ramming of this horrible plan down our American throats is disgusting 🤢and unlawful, being accomplished with unauthorized executive orders. 

Echo essay published by Heather Cox Richardson in Letters from an American

On July 2, 2024, just about a year ago, president of the right-wing Heritage Foundation Kevin Roberts told the listeners of Steve Bannon’s War Room webcast: “[W]e are going to win. We’re in the process of taking this country back.” Roberts pointed to the Supreme Court’s decision in Donald J. Trump v. United States the day before giving the president absolute immunity for committing crimes while engaging in official acts.


“That Supreme Court ruling yesterday on immunity is vital, and it's vital for a lot of reasons,” Roberts said, adding that the nation needs a strong leader because “the left has taken over our institutions.” “[W]e are in the process of the second American Revolution,” he said, “which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be.”

Roberts was the man who organized Project 2025, the blueprint for a new kind of government dictated by a right-wing strongman. Creating that new government would require a president willing to act illegally, stripping the secular language of civil rights from public life, packing the government with loyalists, ending the social safety net, killing business regulations, and purging American institutions of all but right-wing ideologues.

When Americans learned about Project 2025, they hated it. An NBC News poll from September 2024 showed that only 4% of Americans saw the project favorably. Even among Republicans, that number climbed only to 7%. For those identifying as MAGA Republicans, the number rose to just 9%.

So Trump and his campaign advisors denied that he had anything to do with the plan. “I know nothing about Project 2025,” he wrote on social media in July. “I have no idea who is behind it.”

And yet six months into the second Trump administration, on the sixtieth anniversary of the law that symbolized the modern American state by establishing Medicare and Medicaid, it’s clear we are indeed in a revolution designed to destroy the government we have known in favor of the radical right-wing government envisioned by those who wrote Project 2025.

From the beginning, the administration declared war on the words that protected equal rights for all Americans, fired women and racial minorities from leadership positions, and attacked transgender Americans. It worked to replace civil servants with loyalists who embraced the tenets of Project 2025, putting people like former Fox News host Pete Hegseth at the head of government agencies. Yesterday Greg Jaffe and Maggie Haberman of the New York Times reported that in a break with past practices, Hegseth, now secretary of defense, is requiring nominees for four-star general positions in the U.S. military to meet personally with Trump.

It worked to dismantle the government by refusing to release the money Congress had appropriated to fund the existing government. Thanks to billionaire Elon Musk at the “Department of Government Efficiency” and Russell Vought—another author of Project 2025—at the Office of Management and Budget, the administration illegally impounded funds, slashing through funding for foreign aid, cancer research, veterans’ benefits, air traffic control staffing, and so on, claiming to be eliminating “waste, fraud, and abuse.” That fight is ongoing.

But while it shrank government programs that helped ordinary people—programs like the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)—as part of their claim to be returning power to the states, the administration did not shrink the government itself. Instead, it dramatically expanded the government’s capacity to arrest and detain undocumented migrants.

The administration set out to purge the country of what extremists claimed was “leftist” influence in law firms, media, and universities. It illegally blocked lawyers from law firms that represented Democrats from access to federal buildings, making it impossible for them to represent their clients. It sued media outlets for alleged bias, and it withheld congressionally appropriated funds for universities for alleged antisemitism.

Last week, in order to obtain the Federal Communications Commission's approval of an $8 billion merger between CBS parent company Paramount and Skydance Media, Skydance agreed not to set up programs related to civil rights, or “diversity, equity, and inclusion,” and to produce “unbiased” journalism. Federal Communications Commission chair Brendan Carr approved the merger, then bragged on right-wing media shows that CBS has agreed to put in place an internal political “bias monitor” who will report to the president of Paramount to make sure the channel’s news coverage is favorable to Trump and the right wing.

Last week, after Columbia University agreed to pay $221 million and to promise it will not use “race, color, sex, or national origin” in hiring decisions in exchange for the government’s restoring the $1.3 billion in funding the administration had withheld over charges of antisemitism, Trump’s education secretary Linda McMahon told Maria Bartiromo of the Fox (Fake) News Channel: “[T]his is a monumental victory for conservatives who’ve wanted to do things on these elite campuses for a long time because we had such far left leaning professors.”

On Monday the Office of Personnel Management issued a memo allowing federal employees to pray publicly at work, as well as to try to “persuade others of the correctness of their own religious views.”

The administration has worked to dismantle the regulations that protect Americans by using artificial intelligence to slash regulations in half by next January. With the blessing of the Supreme Court, Trump has claimed the power to fire the heads of independent agencies, effectively giving him power over agencies created by Congress.

Yesterday the administration took its fight against public protections a leap further when the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed a new rule that would get rid of a rule in place since 2009 establishing, on the basis of scientific evidence, that the emission of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and methane warms the planet and thus endangers human life. Most of the vehicle, factory, and power plant emissions standards currently in place come from this “endangerment finding.”

EPA officials told Lisa Friedman of the New York Times they intend to argue that it is climate regulations, rather than greenhouse gas emissions, that cause the real harm to human health because they lead to higher prices and less consumer choice.

As Roberts said, the Supreme Court’s decision giving Trump immunity was important because destroying the country’s institutions would require lawbreaking. In nothing has that been so clear as in the administration’s handling of the rendering of undocumented migrants to third countries. Whistleblowers from the Department of Justice claim that DOJ official Emil Bove told DOJ attorneys they could ignore court orders stopping migrant flights, saying they should consider telling the courts “f*ck you.”

Last night, the Senate confirmed Bove to a federal judgeship, with 50 Republicans voting in favor. Forty-seven Democrats voted no. They were joined by Republicans Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, who said: “I don’t think that somebody who has counseled other attorneys that you should ignore the law, you should reject the law, I don’t think that that individual should be placed in a lifetime seat on the bench.

But Thom Tillis (R-NC) voted in favor of Bove’s confirmation, illustrating that even those Republicans who have put distance between themselves and Trump are enabling the revolution in our government.

Republicans in Congress have enabled the dismantling of the country’s social safety net with dramatic cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program while also extending significant tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations and pouring money into purges of undocumented migrants. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told an audience at an event for the right-wing media outlet Breitbart that the new “Trump accounts” established by the budget reconciliation bill are “a backdoor for privatizing Social Security.”
💢😧❗⚠️

Congress’s unwillingness to stand against Trump shows most dramatically in its reluctance to reassert the power the Constitution gives to it—and only to it—over tariffs. Trump has fought his tariff war only by asserting emergency power, but he has used that power to change world trade and to punish countries like Brazil for its prosecution of Trump’s political ally, former president Jair Bolsonaro. The day before the August 1 deadline, on which most of Trump’s tariffs will go into effect, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will weigh in on whether those tariffs are legal.

When Kevin Roberts announced a year ago that the radical right was launching a second American revolution, he was telling the truth.
😱 ❗ But, the new world they want to bring to life seems no more popular now, than it was then.

And now the growing scandal around Donald J. Trump’s connections to late convicted sex predator Jeffrey Epstein shows that the MAGA movement is apparently willing to accept the sexual abuse of children in order to cement their worldview.

Trump tried to cast himself as a sort of protector when he claimed that he turned against Epstein because Epstein “stole people that worked for me.” When asked if those employees were young women, Trump answered “yes” and that they were hired “out of the spa” he ran. He said one of those girls was Virginia Giuffre, who was sex trafficked as a teenager by Ghislaine Maxwell and died by suicide earlier this year. Although Trump’s timeline did not add up—Guiffre left her job at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 and the friendship between the two men continued for several more years—the story itself suggests what’s on his mind. A reporter asked Trump about those girls: “What did you think Epstein was stealing those women for
❓😥

Today Dan Ruetenik of CBS News issued a detailed report about the video from outside Epstein’s jail cell that the DOJ has released as proof he died by suicide. A government source told Ruetenik that the released video is not raw footage—confirming a report by Dhruv Mehrotra of Wired on July 15—and that it is two videos stitched together. Ruetenik reported that the FBI, the Bureau of Prisons, and the DOJ inspector general all possess the longer video.

And perhaps there is also a story about Project 2025’s staying power in the fact that this damning report was dropped less than a week after Trump officials celebrated their control over CBS.—

Notes:
https://www.mediamatters.org/project-2025/heritage-foundation-president-celebrates-supreme-court-immunity-decision-we-are

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/poll-project-2025-broadly-known-severely-unpopular-voters-rcna172660

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/21/magazine/heritage-foundation-kevin-roberts.html

https://www.democracydocket.com/analysis/what-is-project-2025-and-why-is-it-alarming/

https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/03/us/politics/heritage-foundation-2025-policy-america.html

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/here-we-are-2

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/29/us/politics/generals-trump.html

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/07/28/trump-federal-employees-preach-faith-work-00480696

https://www.npr.org/2025/07/25/nx-s1-5479240/columbia-trump-administration-settlement-details

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/24/business/media/fcc-skydance-merger-paramount.html

https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/supreme-court-puts-humphreys-executor-on-death-bed/
The Epstein Crisis No One Controls
Guest article by Michael Cohen…
Read more
8 hours ago · 855 likes · 130 comments · Michael Cohen and MeidasTouch Network

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jeffrey-epstein-jail-video-investigation/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/07/26/doge-ai-tool-cut-regulations-trump/

https://www.cms.gov/about-cms/who-we-are/history

Bluesky:
atrupar.com/post/3lupiv74kmm2n

thetnholler.bsky.social/post/3lv7afo2dzk2z

© 2025 Heather Cox Richardson
548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104
Unsubscribe

Labels: , , , , , , , ,