Trumpziism's incompetence becomes more evident and grows while his lies overhwelm our media around the world

There are many reasons to be deeply concerned about Donald Trump’s White House incompetence. 

An echo essay published in Medium (Everyone Has A Story To Tell) an on line publishing site by Tony Davis: 

Fire Pege Hegseth NOW ❗

Look at the evidence👀❗ The mendacity (aka "lying"🤥), cruelty, and the prideful ignorance are palpable. His complete lack of character, the transactional nature of every interaction, his status as a convicted felon, an adjudicated rapist, and his record of being impeached twice are damning. But even more, a new worry has emerged: Trump is determined to appoint people to senior leadership positions who are notably less competent and less informed than he is. And this is not an easy task.

Truly great leaders are not threatened by the intelligence of others; they actively seek out the smartest people to help lead. Their intelligence and experience are key components of their success, and they often strive to be the least intelligent person in the room — precisely because they value the expertise of those they hire. For a president, this is an essential trait, given the breadth and complexity of issues they must address. A president must rely on the deep knowledge and experience of their advisors to make informed decisions for the American people.

A Historical Perspective on Expertise in Leadership

There are clear examples in American history to prove how presidents who chose highly skilled and knowledgeable individuals for their cabinets were praised for their leadership. These figures are often celebrated for their transformative policies and expertise. Here are just five cabinet officials who exemplify this:

• Alexander Hamilton (Secretary of the Treasury, 1789–1795)Expertise: Finance and Economics: Achievements: Hamilton was the architect of the American financial system, establishing the First Bank of the United States and designing a federal financial structure that stabilized the fledgling economy.
• Henry Clay (Secretary of State, 1825–1829)-Expertise: Diplomacy and Legislation: Achievements: Clay, known as “The Great Compromiser,” played a pivotal role in shaping early American foreign and domestic policy, advancing initiatives like the Monroe Doctrine.
• William H. Seward (Secretary of State, 1861–1869)- Expertise: Diplomacy: Achievements: Seward’s diplomatic skill helped prevent foreign intervention in the Civil War, and his negotiation of the Alaska Purchase laid the groundwork for American expansion.
• George Marshall (Secretary of State, 1947–1949; Secretary of Defense, 1950–1951)- Expertise: Military and International Affairs: Achievements: Marshall was the mastermind behind the Marshall Plan, which rebuilt Western Europe after World War II, countering Soviet influence and fostering long-term stability.
• James Madison (Secretary of State, 1801–1809)- Expertise: Constitutional Law and Diplomacy: Achievements: Madison played a key role in the Louisiana Purchase and brought his deep understanding of constitutional law to shape early U.S. governance.

These leaders are revered for their expertise and lasting impact, setting a high bar for what a presidential cabinet can and should achieve. Unfortunately, Trump’s choices for his second term fall far short of this standard.

Trump’s Troubling Cabinet Selections: Ouch🤕❗ 

Pete Hegseth is completely incompetent and compromised by his history of alcoholism and worse Elon Musk was never vetted he is not elected to do anything except to pay people to be Trumpziism's cult loyalists. 

Instead of selecting individuals with deep knowledge and expertise, Trump’s incompetent nominations suggest a preference for loyalty over competence. The result is a “clown car” of willful ignorance and aggressive incompetence that is not only offensive but potentially dangerous. Here are some of the most concerning nominations:

• Pete Hegseth as Secretary of Defense- Concerns: Hegseth, a former Army National Guard officer and Fox (Fake❗) News host, has little experience managing large-scale military operations. His selection raises serious doubts about his preparedness to oversee the Department of Defense, a role that requires extensive strategic expertise.
• Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS)- Concerns: Kennedy’s well-documented anti-vaccine stance alarmed public health experts, who fear his appointment will undermine vaccine initiatives and erode public trust in health policies, risking lives during future health crises.
• Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence- Concerns: Gabbard’s limited experience in intelligence and her controversial foreign policy positions cast doubt on her ability to oversee national intelligence operations effectively.

Loyalty Over Competence

Trump’s selections appear to prioritize personal loyalty over qualifications and expertise. This is very troubling because it undermines the effectiveness of federal agencies, which rely on competent leadership to function properly. By choosing individuals who are unlikely to challenge his decisions, Trump may be surrounding himself with yes-men rather than experienced advisors capable of providing independent, informed counsel.

Consolidating Power at the Expense of Democracy

Experts also warn that Trump’s cabinet is part of a broader strategy to consolidate power within the executive branch. Such a move risks eroding the checks and balances fundamental to democratic governance. By appointing loyalists rather than seasoned professionals, Trump could weaken the accountability mechanisms essential for a healthy democracy.

A Dangerous Path Forward

These cabinet ppointees and other loyalists reflect a troubling trend that will have far-reaching consequences for public health, justice, national security, and the balance of power in U.S. government. Trump’s preference for loyalty over expertise suggests a repeat of the disastrous decision-making seen during his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. If history is any guide, the consequences of these incompetent appointees will be severe, potentially leading to a new wave of preventable crises.

The True Motivation❓

Only Trump knows the full reasons behind his decision to appoint individuals who seem less competent than himself, but it likely stems from a desire to avoid dissent and ensure that no one questions his authority. This is a dangerous precedent, particularly when the stakes involve the health, safety, and security of the American people.

The implications of Trump’s choices for key leadership positions are stark. Instead of the competent, experienced leadership that the American public deserves, we are likely to see a repeat of the mismanagement, chaos, and preventable deaths that marked the most troubling periods of his first term. History will not look kindly on the decisions being made today, and the consequences may well be borne by a great many Americans in the years to