If lawyers lie about Twitter posts? That's OOJ

Attorney for Donald Trump said he composed the "sloppy" Tweet about why Mike Flynn was fired as the National Security Adviser.

Trump's lawyer: I wrote the president's 'sloppy' tweet 

Flynn's dismissal- Donald Trump's "sloppy" Twitter message on Sunday morning (Ahhh, do you mean to tell me, there are people really working in the White House on Sunday morning?~ Who knew?) ~ ABCNews report by Jordyn Phelps, Katherine Faulders and Devin Dwyer

John Dowd says he is the person who drafted the president's Sunday morning Twitter message: 

"I had to fire General Flynn because he lied to the Vice President and the FBI," Trump tweeted at 9:14 a.m. on Saturday. "He has pled guilty to those lies. It is a shame because his actions during the transition were lawful. There was nothing to hide!"

Dowd told ABC News he wrote those words and had done so in a "sloppy" manner. A second source familiar with the matter corroborated his account. (So, how many people work in the White House on early Sunday mornings?~ HELLO?)

Four questions leap out about this Twitter post and John Dowd's response, taking the fall for Donald Trump:

Donald Trump's attorney looks like he's infected with the "sloppies"- John Dowd admitted that he composed the "sloppy" Twitter message posted by @realDonaldTrump

1.  If John Dowd composed a "sloppy" Tweet, shouldn't he be fired for misconduct?

2.  What is the billable rate for a White House attorney who is composing Twitter messages for Donald Trump on an early Sunday morning?  

3.  When Donald Trump posts Twitter messages, isn't he the sole author of those messages?  If so, and I do believe this to be the case, then Donald Trump is guilty of obstruction of justice (OOJ).  By admitting on Twitter to knowing that Michael Flynn lied to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and, subsequently, asking then Director James Comey to "go easy on Flynn", Donald Trump is admitting to obstructing justice.  
4. In the universe of "all lies are possible", if John Dowd, in reality, lied about having composed Donald Trump's Twitter message, if he didn't compose it at all, but just said so to protect his high paying client, isn't this a reason to strip him of his license to practice law?

Any of the above questions could stand alone in providing evidence about White House misconduct in the Mueller investigation.

In other words, Donald Trump has been telling lies to the American people, ever since he began his flawed campaign, with Russian help, to win the illegal 2016 election, where he wrongly became president. 

Moreover, in as much as John Dowd admitted to composing a "sloppy" Tweet, or has lied about doing so, (apparently Dowd was half asleep on Sunday morning?) then he must be fired for misconduct.