White Christian nationalism is not Christian and is a threat to democracy rooted in the Constitution

Echo editorial opinion by Steve Corbin, published in The Gazette, an Iowa newspaper:

You may be among the 35 percent of Americans who have never heard the term “white Christian nationalism.” But, of those citizens who are knowledgeable of the concept, it carries a decidedly negative view. The belief is becoming more and more important to understand as cultural diversity, racism, immigration issues, political divisiveness and political candidate pandering is before us.

What is white Christian nationalism? Generally — according to the Southern Poverty Law Center — it “refers to a political ideology and identity that fuses white supremacy, Christianity and American nationalism, and whose proponents claim that the United States is a `Christian Nation.’”

Research conducted by the non-partisan Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) with the non-partisan Brookings Institution (BI) as well as a poll sponsored by Southern Poverty Law Center/Tulchin have the same conclusion: white Christian nationalism movement is a growing threat to America’s democracy.

The far-right anti-government and religious rights movement of the 1990s, is getting stronger and stronger and will play a major role in the 2024, local, county, state and federal elections❗

During the November 21-December 14, 2022, time period, 6,212 Americans were asked by PRRI/BI for their reply to these five statements: 

1. The U.S. government should declare America a Christian nation, 2. U.S. laws should be based on Christian values, 

3. If the U.S. moves away from our Christian foundations, we will not have a country anymore, 

4. Being Christian is an important part of being truly American and 5. God has called Christians to exercise dominion over all areas of American society.

Answers across all five questions were found to be highly correlated with a margin of error of plus or minus 1.6 percent at the 95 percent level of confidence.

Fifty-four percent of the GOP faithful are adherents of Christian nationalism vs. 23 percent of independents and 15 percent of Democrats.

The PRRI/BI research notes five core attitudes are often associated with Christian nationalist beliefs: 

• anti-Black, antisemitic, 
• anti-Muslim,
• anti-immigration and 
• patriarchal adherence of traditional gender roles.

Furthermore, research revealed “Christian nationalism beliefs are strongly correlated with support for QAnon, an extremist movement of the political right,” whose tenets include: 

1. The government, media and financial worlds are controlled by a group of Satan-worshipping pedophiles who run a global child sex-trafficking operation. 

2. There is a storm coming soon that will sweep away the elites in power and restore the rightful leaders and 

3. Because things have gotten so far off track, true American patriots may have to resort to violence in order to save our country.

The Southern Poverty Law Center offers a summary of the movement that should be a wake-up call to Americans: “White Christian nationalism is a key ideology that inspired the failed January 6, 2021, insurrection and fueled multiple failed political campaigns in 2022,… however, white Christian nationalism remains a persistent and growing threat to U.S. democracy.”

Any person with a modicum of intelligence knows European colonists immigrated to America to escape religious persecution, expand their economic opportunities and live in a country where there was separation of church and state. Followers of the white Christian nationalism movement want to contradict the principles and norms of democracy and make America an authoritarian country.

Adherents of white Christian nationalism are like wrecking balls, the drivers of antidemocratic conspiracy theories and election denialism (SPLC, 2023) and possibly book banning, LGBTQIA denigration, “sanitized” Black history curriculum, anti-female reproductive laws, gerrymandering and attacking diversity, equity and inclusion.

Currently there are 14 Republicans and three Democrats wanting to win the 2024, presidential election. Hundreds of candidates will be seeking local, county, state and federal offices of power. Citizens must be vigilant and keep candidates who espouse any resemblance of white Christian nationalism out of public office.

Steve Corbin is professor emeritus of marketing at the University of Northern Iowa.

Opinion content represents the viewpoint of the author or The Gazette editorial board. The Gazette has been informing Iowans with in-depth local news coverage and insightful analysis for 140 years

Donald Trump is not qualified to lead the American pandemic response

COLUMN: Trump is a dangerously bad source on coronavirus
Echo opinion published in the Waterloo, Iowa newspaper The Courier written by Steve Corbin*

"Don't take medical advice from Trump."- reported in BBCNews.

At a dangerous time when COVID-19, a deadly virus just like the swine flu, is spreading coast to coast and border to border, Americans should be able to rely on the advice of Donald Trump.

Or, should we listen to scientists instead of our commander in chief?

According to the nonpartisan Pew Research Center, 86 percent of Americans are confident scientists act in the best interest of the public. Today, 64 percent have expressed “no confidence” in President Donald Trump.

In October 2009, right wing Rush Limbaugh declared “screw you” during his radio program, in reaction to Obama administration’s recommendation for people to get a vaccination against the swine flu. On the right wing propaganda Fox News, Glenn Beck urged voters to do “the exact opposite” of scientific advisers’ recommendation. Donald Trump called into Fox News, dismissed concern about the swine flu and told host Neil Cavuto that “it’s going to go away” and “the vaccines can be very dangerous.”

As a result of lemmings following the advice of Limbaugh, Beck and Trump, research by Dr. Matthew Baum of Harvard University found Republicans were much less likely to get vaccinated. Predominantly, Republican states had higher death rates than predominantly Democratic states. Sadly, 12,469 Americans died due to the swine flu (The Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 2011).

As Nicholas Kristof of The New York Times reported March 7, “This is a case where toxic right-wing bluster was not only corrosive but also apparently lethal — but only to true believers.”

Based on that information, I think it’s safe to say it’s dangerous to listen to ideologues rather than scientists.

Trump’s dislike of science is quite evident: Climate change is a Chinese hoax, vaccines are dangerous and wind turbines cause cancer. He prohibited Centers for Disease Control and Prevention officials from using words like “evidence-based” and “science-based” in official documents. He’s cut funding to CDC and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) while dissing the World Health Organization (WHO).

With COVID-19, who do we now need for advice, guidance and counsel? Indeed, it's CDC, NIH and WHO. What goes around, comes around.

According to a March 8, New Yorker article, “Physicians and public health officials are dispirited by the president’s public pronouncements, saying that he has added to the danger of the crisis by minimizing its scale and the need for rigorous precautions.”

The New York Times reports “the White House instructed one of the nation’s top infectious disease experts, Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, not to say anything else without White House clearance.” Heretofore, with the SARS and Ebola outbreaks, federal scientists communicated directly with the public.

Dr. Michael Mina, epidemiologist at Harvard’s T. H. Chan School of Public Health, notes, “We need the president to put the well-being of the American people before his re-election. And that requires open discussion and accurate information.”

David Remmick of The New Yorker writes, “Has there ever been a less serious president?”

Trump’s “poisoning the well” attitude hasn’t helped. Guess who, on Feb. 24, jumped in to support Trump? Rush Limbaugh told his listeners, “I want to tell you the truth about the coronavirus. Yeah, I’m dead right on this. The coronavirus is the common cold, folks.”

Charlie Sykes, a staunch Republican and founder of Bulwark, a conservative news site, tweeted about Limbaugh: “stunningly reckless.”

The time is long overdue for Trump to stop playing politics with COVID-19 and put scientists back in charge without them seeking White House approval as to what to apprise Americans about the epidemic. I’m confident obtaining national and Iowa-based scientific information about COVID-19 at www.cdc.gov and www.idph.iowa.gov is more advisable than following the unscientific musings of Limbaugh, Beck and Trump.

*Check out Steve Corbin on Facebook at this site here.