Maine Writer

Its about people and issues I care about.

My Photo
Name:
Location: Topsham, MAINE, United States

My blogs are dedicated to the issues I care about. Thank you to all who take the time to read something I've written.

Tuesday, February 03, 2026

Donald Trump and maga Republicans must end the ICE Gestapo "Army of Occupation" terrorizing all Americans

Echo opinion letters published in The New York Times:
#ICEOut

A Backlash Against ICE’s ‘Army of Occupation’

The move by the Trump administration to remove the Border Patrol official Gregory Bovino from the anti-immigrant operation in Minnesota and replace him with Tom Homan, the Donald Trump border czar, feels like a way to take Bovino out of the line of fire and divert attention from the real issue.

The real issue is how Donald Trump is using an agency to enforce a draconian and violent program directed at nonwhite immigrants and their American citizen supporters. The program violates laws and the Constitution in multiple ways, and has resulted in the killing of two American citizens, Renee Good and Alex Pretti.

Whatever ICE was set up to do, it has become an army of occupation directed at Democratic cities. Violating laws violently for political purposes seems like the essence of domestic terrorism. In this case, it is directed by the Donald Trump administration with the apparent support of the Republican Party.

At this point, ICE should be defunded and disbanded. Congress (including leadership by Maine's Senator Susan Collins)  should act in an adult manner to hold accountable those who killed Ms. Good and Mr. Pretti, and violated the rights of many more.


A new agency must be designed from the ground up for the stated purposes of immigration enforcement, one that operates according to the Constitution, the law and not the whim of a self-proclaimed dictator.

From Simon Cohen in Queens, New York

The New York Times editorial board rightly emphasizes that Kristi Noem, the secretary of homeland security, and Gregory Bovino, a Border Patrol official, “are lying in defiance of obvious truths.” 

Just because Bovino is removed from the anti-immigrant operation in Minnesota doesn’t change that.

Last week, in a speech to the British Parliament commemorating the coming 250th anniversary of our country’s founding, the U.S. House speaker, Mike Johnson, quoting the British writer and philosopher G.K. Chesterton, said that “every high civilization decays by forgetting obvious things.” One of those things, he noted, is the “indispensable relationship between freedom and virtue.”

Truth is the precondition for accountability. It is also virtuous, making it indispensable to our freedom as Americans. Our democracy will decay if we forget this.

It is therefore incumbent upon Johnson and his congressional colleagues to investigate the killings of Mr. Alex Pretti and Ms. Renee Good to establish the truth. His duty as House speaker — and as a member of our “high civilization” — demands it.

From T. Michael Spencer in Washington

To the Editor: Yes, the Trump administration is lying to our faces. This editorial encapsulates our current national situation.

I am a lifelong resident of Minnesota, 86 years of age. Our state is known as a liberal state and mostly votes Democratic. That apparently does not sit well with the current administration.

We are besieged by federal government forces flooding our streets, terrorizing our residents, scaring our kids. They have brutally and unjustly killed two citizens here since they arrived.

Where is this going When will it end Who is safe now

😡😞😟

From Judith Koll Healey in  Minneapolis

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, November 21, 2024

Republicans wrongfully support Trumpian mass deportations will put all Americans at risk for deportation

Echo opinion letters published in The New York Times: 
Dear Editor:  Although President Biden has promised a smooth transition for Donald Trump after this election, we Americans should take strong steps, including mass protests and smart political strategies to oppose and stop all efforts of the Trump administration to conduct mass deportations of immigrants.

The New Colossus:  "Give me your tired, your poor,Your huddled masses yearning to breath free", Emma Lazarus


The former acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and now Trump’s choice to be “border czar,” Thomas Homan, said that immigrants can avoid the horrific family separation by being deported together. I guess he means that those immigrants who are here legally can choose to leave the U.S. with children and relatives who are being deported.

We Americans who value justice, liberty and morality must oppose and fight against the ruthless and fiendish plans of Mr. Trump and his acolytes, who have little respect for the traditional values of our great nation. The time to fight for justice is now, and powerful and peaceful protests should start now so Mr. Trump knows what he faces when he takes office.

From: J. Gorman in Queens, New York
The writer is a retired New York Police Department lieutenant


To the Editor:  How will government officers find all those undocumented immigrants they plan to round up in the largest mass deportation of immigrants in American history❓


Undocumented immigrants look no different than anyone else walking down the street. Which means that you and I — all 345 million of us in this country — are subject to being stopped and forced to prove we are here legally.

To limit the field, officers may be forced to stop only people who look “foreign.” Of course, many people born here look “foreign.” Many people who are foreign don’t look foreign. Will courts allow profiling based on appearance?

When we are stopped, how will we even prove we are legal so we can stay out of the planned detention camps? We all don’t go around with immigration or naturalization papers. We don’t all have passports. I don’t carry ID unless I’m driving, drinking or using the AARP discount. My only proof is my birth certificate, which I can’t even find.


Even if courts say it is legal to stop anyone for any reason, how long would Americans put up with their own government harassing them?

The government may try to ease the pain by setting up offices in every city and requiring everyone to go there with proof of citizenship. Employees will then issue us cards to carry at all times to show officers. Or the government might force us to get tattoos on our arms or foreheads so we won’t even have to be stopped.

Mass deportation will encroach on our liberty. But the sacrifice will be worth it to rid America of the scourge of “illegals,”, so Trump will tell us. If you are legal, he’ll say, you shouldn’t mind having your rights violated.


From Joe Kollin in Lake Worth, Fla.

To the Editor:  I have some questions for those who favor mass deportation:

Do you grow your own food❓ Do you kill, gut and process the beef cattle, hogs, poultry and fish yourself❓

After the men, women and children, who do these jobs are deported, will you step up❓ Will you❓ (Maine Writer:😔 IDTS)

Food for thought.🍲🥘🥫

From: Florence England in Kansas City, Missouri.


Maine Writer post script:  All Americans who are not Native Americans are here today because we have immigrant ancestors.  Suppose we cannot prove where our parents were born....❓❓❓

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, December 02, 2023

A march towards expulsion for George Santos but why did it take so long?

Echo report published in amnyNewsletter (AM New York Metro is a free daily newspaper that is published in New York City) by Robert Pozarycki, Ben Brachfeld, Michael Malasczcyk and Ethan Stark-Miller:

George Santos Took Donation From Migrant-Smuggler
Serial liar and border-hardliner George Santos accepted support from an Italian caught piloting a yacht full of Chinese migrants and from his prominent restaurant-owning family. (Reported in Daily Beast)

QUEENS, NY- After a turbulent 11 months in office, Santos was unceremoniously expelled from the House of Representatives Friday (December 1, 2023)— a rare moment of overwhelming bipartisanship that reflected the gravity of the fraud allegations against the man elected in 2022, to represent the 3rd District covering northeast Queens and northern Nassau County.

From the start, Santos’ term was tainted by revelations in a New York Times exposé in December 2022, which found that he had extensively lied about his background on the campaign trail. 

In the report, it was alleged the Republican lied about almost everything — where he went to school, where he worked, his personal fortune, even his faith.

A House Ethics Committee only served to reinforce those federal indictments, which Santos slandered with the Trumpian vernacular as “witch hunt.”

And yet, over 11 months, Santos managed to outlast public shaming, calls for his resignation from even his Republican colleagues, two lengthy speaker votes and two failed expulsion votes before the House showed him the door.  (A complete consumption of non-productive time.  Maine Writer opinion, voters do not want to pay our legislators to engage in endless expulsion debates!)

The expulsion effort itself was extraordinary, because it marked the first time a sitting House member had been ousted without previously being convicted of a felony, setting what some have deemed a concerning precedent.

But Santos’ occupancy of New York’s 3rd District seat was itself without precedent, given the magnitude of falsehoods that paved his way to Washington.

September 2022: Like many undoings of elected officials caught in scandal, the unraveling of George Santos began with a local newspaper article — though few turned out to have noticed when it first came out.

The North Shore Leader, a paper covering areas of northern Nassau County, reported in September 2022, that Santos had filed a Personal Financial Disclosure Report claiming his personal wealth at $11 million. Reporter Maureen Daly described it as an “inexplicable rise,” because in filings from his 2020 campaign, he reported “no assets over $5,000” and “a net worth barely above zero.”

That September 2022, report would later come back to bite both Santos and his campaign treasurer, Nancy Marks. 

But the North Shore Leader report did not make any immediate impact on the campaign between Santos and Democratic nominee Robert Zimmerman in the contest to fill the 3rd District seat occupied by the outgoing Tom Suozzi, who had previously made a failed bid to become governor.

On the campaign trail, Santos styled himself as a typical Republican candidate of the times. His campaign website featured a bio in which he railed about “out-of-control” inflation and “rampant” crime in the streets, and claiming that “New Yorkers have watched their communities suffer due to the failed policies pushed by extreme Democrat rule in Washington and Albany.”

Nov. 8, 2022:  But that was only the tip of the iceberg. During his 11 months on Capitol Hill, Santos would be indicted not once, but twice on federal fraud charges after investigations found he had bilked thousands of dollars in campaign funds, and submitted fraudulent documents to both Congress and the national Republican Party regarding his personal fortune in order to receive more financial backing.

Santos was swept into office on Election Day, powered by a “red wave” of Republican voters on Long Island who put all four Nassau and Suffolk County’s Congressional seats into the GOP column. 

The outcome was not unexpected, given that Republicans tend to do well in midterm elections when a Democrat is in the White House, and a court-drawn redistricting plan proved more favorable for Republicans than Democrats would have liked.

December 19, 2022:  What wasn’t expected, however, was The New York Times profile in December on Santos, that accused him of lying about almost every aspect of his life.

Santos had claimed he worked for Citigroup and Goldman Sachs. Both financial giants denied he was ever employed there.

Santos had claimed he attended NYU and Baruch College. Both educational institutions denied he was ever enrolled.

Santos had claimed to have founded a nonprofit animal rescue organization called Friends of Pets United. The Times reported there were no records of the charity having existed.

Even Santos’ claim that he was Jewish and descended from Holocaust survivors turned out to be embellished. Santos refuted that he ever claimed to be Jewish, telling the New York Post that he was Catholic, and “Because I learned my maternal family had a Jewish background, I said I was ‘Jew-ish.'” 😕❓

The whoppers drew comparisons between Santos and George Costanza, the notorious liar from the classic sitcom Seinfeld

But the Santos situation was no laughing matter.

January 3-7, 2023:  Santos was to have been sworn into office on January 3, 2023, along with the other 434 elected House members, but that inauguration was delayed by the marathon election of Kevin McCarthy as speaker. 

After 15 votes in a fractious Republican House caucus, McCarthy finally won the post early on the morning of January 7; Santos had voted for McCarthy all 15 times.

January 11: After the Times expose came out and Santos admitted to falsifying his background in part, he quickly lost the support of Republicans in his home district. Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman and the Nassau County GOP publicly called for Santos to step aside. Days later, groups of voters in the 3rd District protest outside Santos’ office in Douglaston demanding his ouster, the first of many such demonstrations throughout the year.

But Santos remained defiant.

“I was elected to serve the people of #NY03 not the party & politicians,” Santos tweeted. “I remain committed to doing that and regret to hear that local officials refuse to work with my office to deliver results to keep our community safe and lower the cost of living. I will NOT resign!”

February 7:  Santos evoked the ire of Utah Senator Mitt Romney during President Joe Biden’s State of the Union Address in February. Romney chided Santos for attempting to shake hands with the president and flatly told Santos, “You don’t belong here.”


Taking the low road, Santos fired back at Romney on Twitter, reminding him of his 2012 presidential election loss to Barack Obama.


February, 23:  
Perhaps in an effort to anger liberals, Santos co-sponsors legislation to make the AR-15 — the weapon of choice for numerous mass shooters in recent years — the national gun of the United States. ❗It is one of many far-right bills ❗ Santos signs on to during his short tenure on Capitol Hill.  

Other far-right legislation which he either introduced or publicly supported includes bills requiring the president to undergo an annual cognitive examination; restricting the federal government’s ability to mandate vaccines; barring social media companies from deplatforming anyone; banning transgender athletes from competing in athletic competitions based on their own identity, euphemistically referred to as the “Protection of Women & Girls in Sports Act”; and preventing the federal government from regulating elections.

April 4:  Donald Trump, the Republican former president, was indicted in April in New York for an alleged hush money scheme to cover up a reported extramarital affair

Three more indictments followed within months, with Trump being accused of illegally hoarding classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago home in Florida, provoking the January 6, 2021, insurrection by his supporters on Capitol Hill, and engaging in a vast conspiracy in Georgia to illegally overturn the election results there in 2020.

When Trump appeared in a Manhattan court in April for the first indictment, George Santos made his way over there to capture some of the limelight for himself, along with another right-wing firebrand, Georgia Congress Member Marjorie Taylor-Greene.

The rally outside Trump’s arraignment hearing turned out to be a bust for Santos and Greene, who fled when confronted by counter-protesters and the press. But in a month’s time, Santos himself would find himself facing his own legal troubles.

May 10: Santos was hit with a 13-count federal indictment charging him with fraud, money laundering, theft of public funds, and lying to the House of Representatives. He’s accused of defrauding the state Labor Department to receive unemployment benefits; siphoning off campaign contributions to his personal bank accounts for his own profit; and grossly exaggerating his personal wealth in campaign finance forms presented to Congress.

After securing release on $500,000 bond, Santos denounced the indictment as a “witch hunt” in speaking to reporters outside the federal courthouse in Central Islip.

“This is the beginning of the ability for me to address and defend myself,” Santos told reporters during the media circus. “I’m gonna fight my battle, I’m gonna deliver, I’m gonna fight the witch hunt, I’m gonna take care of clearing my name. And I look forward to doing that.”

May 17:  Santos survived the first attempt by House members to expel him from his seat in an effort largely backed by Democrats. The Republican House majority derails the effort. The House Ethics Committee’s investigation continued.

May 31:  Santos voted against the Fiscal Responsibility Act, which passed Congress anyway. The legislation raised the debt ceiling and averted the country’s first ever default.

June 6:  Questions are raised as to who funded Santos’ $500,000 bond. In a court briefing, the embattled Congressman’s attorney says Santos would rather go to jail than disclosed the individuals who put up his bail. Days later, a judge ruled that Santos had to make the disclosure. It turned out that his aunt and father co-signed the bail certificate.

October 3:  Days after a vote that averted a government shutdown, some of Santos’ far-right colleagues introduced a motion to vacate the chair — effectively seeking to remove Kevin McCarthy as speaker. Eight Republicans joined 212 Democrats in voting to vacate the chair, making McCarthy the first speaker ever to lose his post in the middle of a Congressional session. 

Santos, who had supported McCarthy as speaker in January, voted against the vacate motion. The House entered its second fractious speaker election, paralyzing Congress for the next three weeks while the Republican majority looked to find a new leader.

October 5:  Nancy Marks, who served as Santos’ campaign treasurer for his 2022, campaign, pleaded guilty to a federal felony charge. In the courtroom after entering the guilty plea, Marks read a written statement admitting to filing false numbers with the Federal Election Commission for Santos’s campaign — one of which included a $500,000 donation from Santos himself — in order to meet certain benchmarks for national party approval from the Republican Party.

Marks’ guilty plea was a sign of things to come for Santos.

October 10:  Santos was indicted for a second time in federal court. The second indictment accuses the Congress member of “stealing people’s identities and making charges on his own donors’ credit cards without their authorization,” according to U.S. Attorney of the Eastern District of New York Breon Peace. He is further accuse of submitting fraudulent financial records to the national Republican Party in order to obtain campaign cash.

Santos pleaded not guilty to the second indictment weeks later in Central Islip federal court. If convicted, he faces up to 20 years behind bars.

That same day, Tom Suozzi, who previously held the 3rd District seat, formally announced his campaign to win the seat back next November

At that point, more than a dozen Democrats and Republicans had thrown their hats into the ring.

October 25:  For the second time in his brief term, Santos helped to elect a new speaker of the House. Santos joined the entire Republican majority in giving the gavel to right-wing Louisiana Congress Member Mike Johnson

Santos, who is gay, publicly congratulated Johnson, who is strongly opposed to LGBTQ+ rights, including marriage equality. Johnson is also one of 147 Republicans who voted to overturn the 2020, presidential election results immediately after the January 6, 2021, insurrection by Trump supporters on the U.S. Capitol.

November 1: Yet again, Santos survived an expulsion attempt, this time raised by two of his Long Island colleagues — Republican Congress Members Anthony D’Esposito and Nick LaLota. 

The gambit fails as many House members balk at the concept of expelling a House member who has yet to be convicted of a crime, an unprecedented step. 

Others take a wait-and-see approach, as the House Ethics Committee had yet to release the findings of its investigation into Santos. The vote falls far short of the two-thirds majority needed for a member to be expelled.

November 16: More than a year after his election, the beginning of Santos’ end dawns. The House Ethics Committee released its findings of its inquiry, which not only seemed to verify the criminal charges against Santos, but also that the Congress member allegedly used campaign proceeds for personal expenses from Botox to OnlyFans subscriptions. Santos yet again rebuffed calls to immediately resign, though he did announce that he will not seek re-election in 2024.

November 28:   Dueling resolutions to expel Santos were introduced by Democratic and Republican House members. The Republican resolution, backed by D’Esposito, is put on a fast track for a House vote, eventually scheduled for Dec. 1.

November 29-30:  Despite expressing “real reservations” about the expulsion vote, Speaker Johnson ultimately told his Republican colleagues to “vote their conscience” on Santos’ fate. Democrats in the House who opposed the previous expulsion measure voiced their support for the new vote. Santos remained defiant to the end, refusing to resign, and threatening to expose other corruption on Capitol Hill.

December 1: George Santos, representative of the 3rd District of New York, becomes the sixth Member of Congress in 234 years to be expelled from the House of Representatives. More than 300 members, including over 100 Republicans, supported his ouster, well above the two-thirds majority required for expulsion. Governor Kathy Hochul announced she will soon fill the seat via special election, which will take place within the next three months.

Statement from New York Governor Kathy Hochul about the expulsion of George Santos from the U.S. Congress: 

"I am prepared to undertake the solemn responsibility of filling the vacancy in New York’s 3rd District by scheduling a special election. The people of Long Island and Queens deserve nothing less.”


Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, February 23, 2016

Trump - Rubio - Cruz: immigration candidates

Republicans who support either Donald Trump, Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) or Senator Rafael "Ted" Cruz (R-TX), for the GOP presidential nomination are overlooking the immigration problems these three candidates present.  

In fact, the only two GOP candidates who can prove they are in complete compliance with the US Constitutional requirement for natural born citizenship are Dr. Ben Carson and Governor John Kasich.  Obviously, Carson and Kasich are not GOP front runners, at this time, but they're qualified by the Constitutional standards to run for president. On the other hand, the three who are front runners for the 2016 nomination have issues. In fact, the Trump-Rubio-Cruz standards for running seem to apply to everybody else, but not to each of them individually. Each one will tell the media how they're qualified because they are American citizens but, in fact, maybe they aren't.  What's more important than whether or not they reach the "natural born" standard, their citizenship ambiguities demonstrate hypocrisy about immigration.
Image result for immigration image
Trump-Rubio-Cruz are three immigration-amigos, except they won't stand up for their heritages, to support immigration reforms.
Here's the truth: 

Donald Trump's mother was not a natural born citizen as described in the website https://www.scottishroots.com/people/donald.php

Donald Trump is the son of a Scotswoman. His mother, Mary Anne MacLeod was from the hebridean Island of Lewis, off the west coast of Scotland, from where she emigrated to America and met and married Frederick Trump, of German origin. Donald Trump was on June 14, 1946 in Queens, New York. In other words, Donald Trump is second generation born with immigrant parents.


Senator Marco Rubio - Marco was born in on May 28, 1971, in Miami to Cuban-born parents who came to America following Fidel Castro's takeover. When he was eight years old, Rubio and his family moved to Las Vegas, Nevada where his father worked as a bartender at the Sams Town Hotel and his mother as a housekeeper at the Imperial Palace Hotel. In 1985, the family returned to Miami where his father continued working as a bartender, until 1997, at the Mayfair House Hotel. Thereafter, his father worked as a school crossing guard, until his retirement in 2005. His mother worked as a Kmart stock clerk until 1995, when she retired.  In other words, Senator Rubio is an "anchor baby", born in the US to immigrant parents who secure their residency.  He's also born of immigrant parents.  Nevertheless, Senator Rubio's position on immigration reform makes no sense at all, he seems to slip slide along on this issue. In fact, given Rubio's family's history and their working class origins, he should be a star shining in favor of immigration reform, allowing a path to citizenship for people who qualify under the law. Unfortunately, Senator Rubio won't clearly state what his immigration positions are, but certainly his family's history should influence his opinion.

Senator Rafael "Ted" Cruz was  born on December 22, 1970, at Foothills Hospital, in Calgary, Canada. His parents are Eleanor Elizabeth (Darragh), an American,Wilson and Rafael Bienvenido Cruz, a Cuban. In fact, Cruz's father was born in Cuba, and his grandfather was from the Canary Islands in Spain. His mother was born in Wilmington, Delaware, and is three quarters of Irish descent and one quarter of Italian descent. Clearly, Senator Cruz is the son of an immigrant father and born when his mother was living in Canada.  Therefore, it makes no sense whatsoever for Senator Ted Cruz to oppose immigration reform and prevent a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrant people living in the US, obeying our laws, paying taxes and contributing to the growth of our nation's economy.

Nevertheless, Donald Trump, Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz speak about immigrants as though they were somehow born as descendants of the 1620, Pilgrims who arrived in Massachusetts, on the Mayflower.

Hypocrisy reigns in the Republican party.Yet, the issue shows up like a failed blot on a Rorschach Test, an image gone wrong, when the leading candidates are direct descendants of America's growing ethnic melting pot.  

Labels: , , , , ,