Americans are addicted to immigrants. Bible thumper Mike Johnson is a hypocrite.

Instead of being honest about the border immigrants, Republicans are resorting to ‘blackmail’- Rubin Navarrette, Jr:

Echo opinion published in the 

SAN DIEGO, California — I’m not in the habit of helping politicians do their jobs. They don’t help me do mine, beyond giving me plenty to criticize.

But for House Speaker Mike Johnson — who claims he doesn’t know what to tell constituents who ask why the United States wants to send billions in aid to help defend Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan while the U.S.-Mexico border remains porous — I’ll make an exception.

Johnson definitely needs help. His House Republicans are engaged in a high-stakes game of “border blackmail.” They are holding hostage a spending package that includes funding for allies who live in dangerous neighborhoods around the globe.

In exchange for approving the funding, Republicans want Senate Democrats and the White House to agree to anti-immigration measures — like finishing the border wall, or stopping the practice of “catch and release” — that the GOP claims will magically stop the flow of migrants across the U.S.-Mexico border.

Reality Check No. 1: The fact that Republicans have the audacity to believe that they can stop desperate people from seeking better lives shows how little they know about the “huddled masses.”

Reality check No. 2: This is a really bad time to pull a stunt like this given that Russia, Iran and China appear to be forming an alliance of evil that will undoubtedly challenge the West.

Johnson is making the rounds of conservative media to explain why Republicans are linking two things that have nothing to do with each other: military aid to faraway countries and U.S. border security.

“National security begins at our own borders,” he told the radio host (the right wing radical Catholic!) Hugh Hewitt. “We have to maintain our own sovereignty, that we can project peace through strength and help our friends.” (HELLO?  Hewitt is a radical Catholic who should be supporting the immigration position held by the Roman Catholic Church.  

#Hypocrite "I have very moderate beliefs. Like the founders wanted to protect the church from an encroaching state, not the other way around".  #DinosaurPolicyStatement #RightWingBibleThumper

(The Catholic view of immigration is a view about human beings and why they migrate, recognizing that most do so reluctantly.)

As the speaker sees it, maintaining our national sovereignty doesn’t just mean fending off a terrorist attack or repelling an invading army. It also means stopping the flow of immigrants and asylum seekers who are changing the demographics of the United States.

Johnson would like nothing better than to give fellow Republicans taking points for Christmas.

“You have a lot of members in the House who are going home to constituents and having town halls in their districts,” he told Hewitt. “They’re being asked serious questions about this: Why are we securing the border of a foreign country and taking care of their needs when we’re not doing it here at home? And that’s a tough, tough question to answer.”

Bible thumper House Speaker Mike Johnson

Naverrette, as a professional communicator for more than three decades, "I’m happy to lend a hand".

First, the speaker should stop telling Republican voters what they want to hear and tell them what they need to hear. Like this:

Republican alert! “My dear constituents, one of the things that has always helped to define the Republican Party — as opposed to our friends across the aisle, who like to play the victim — is the firm belief that people need to take responsibility for their actions.

“In the immigration debate, we have to take responsibility for the fact that among the things that got Americans addicted to immigrant labor were parents who raise their children not to do chores around the house, much less hold down an after-school job. And employers who hire illegal immigrants to do jobs that few others want to do. And husbands and wives who, in running a household, hire gardeners, housekeepers and nannies. And, finally, everyday Americans, who don’t care that those who cook our food, or make our beds, or pick our fruit might not have proper documents.

“For too long, we’ve turned a blind eye to the realities of supply and demand. Immigrants come for jobs, and we provide them. Those who seek refugee status often have a relative who is living in the United States, working at a job that we’ve given them.

“Let’s face it. Americans had a good thing going for the last 30 years or so. You could make middle-class wages, yet live an upper-middle-class lifestyle — all thanks to affordable labor.

“But now, along the U.S.-Mexico border, the bill has come due. Despite what you hear from some — including elected officials in my own party — this is not an invasion. It is an invoice.

“We must secure the border. But it wouldn’t hurt for us to also be honest — above all with ourselves — about how the border got to be so insecure in the first place. Anyone have a mirror?”

Of course, I’m dreaming. Johnson doesn’t have the guts or integrity to say that. If he did, he’d be in another line of work.

Navarrette’s email address is crimscribe@icloud.com.

American Roman Catholic Bishops - leadership and political transition

American Catholic Bishops have political explaining to do. How could they not oppose Donald Trump? Shame.

These Bishops did nothing to oppose the draconian anti-immigration policies proposed by the election of Donald Trump. 

Yet, the faithful Roman Catholic Senator Tim Kaine, a social justice supporter and Jesuit missionary, was a qualified candidate running as Hillary Clinton's Vice Presidential nominee.

Nation's Catholic bishops, in Baltimore, to choose their own new president in wake of divisive U.S. election.

America's Catholic bishops return to Baltimore for their annual fall assembly — their first such gathering since a presidential election that split the church as it divided the nation.

It's unclear whether or how the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops will address the election and consequences of  Donald J. Trump, who won the 2016 electoral college vote for president. .

The Republican appealed to traditional Catholics with his opposition to abortion and promises to protect religious organizations from government directives that would violate their teachings.

But his rhetoric against Obama administration policy on refugees drew criticism from church leaders, and his signature policy — a promise to build a wall along the southern border to curb illegal immigration — drew an implied rebuke this year from Pope Francis.


Republican Trump defeated Democrat Hillary Clinton on Tuesday with 52 percent of the Catholic vote, according to exit polls. 

The details reveal church divisions along ethnic lines: Trump won the support of 60 percent of white Catholics, but Clinton won 67 percent of Hispanic Catholics.  Now, leaders and observers say, the prelates will look for ways to move the church forward, together. (As a Roman Catholic woman, I advise the US Bishops to read the article in The New Yorker- "The Moral Minority". Read the article and pay attention to what it says.)

"The bishops will not do a postmortem on a presidential election in the way one might see on CNN or read in The Baltimore Sun," Baltimore Archbishop William E. Lori said. 

"The bishops will certainly look at the results through the lens of our social teaching. We anticipate there will be some bright spots but that there will also be some challenging spots.

"There will also be things we simply don't know, because our new president does not have a governing track record."

The bishops conference has held its annual assembly in Baltimore, the first diocese in the United States, since 2006.

All active and retired bishops in the United States and the U.S. Virgin Islands — nearly 300 members from more than 170 dioceses are among the American Catholic Bishops.

The church leaders will convene on Monday and attend four days of meetings at the Marriott Waterfront Hotel in Harbor East. Topping the agenda: choosing a new president, vice president, and key committee chairs.

Cardinal Daniel DiNardo, the archbishop of Galveston-Houston and the current vice president of the conference, is expected to ascend to the presidency, by tradition. Should that happen, other candidates, including Lori, will be considered for vice president.

The bishops rarely deviate from the overall goal of the conference, which is to share what's going on in their dioceses and to ensure unity on possibly divisive matters.

The conference generally avoids making headline-grabbing policy changes.

"To be perfectly honest, they come together and continually do the same thing," said Chad C. Pecknold, a professor of theology at the Catholic University of America, "which is to ask: 'How can we coordinate our efforts to make the church's witness beautiful and believable in the world?'

"There will be disagreements. We'll see that next week. But to every bishop in that room, there will be the sense that 'We want to communicate a common message.'"

That said, this year's message will contain new elements.

For the first time, the bishops will hold their opening Mass at a historically African-American church, St. Peter Claver in West Baltimore. 

Saint Peter Claver in West Baltimore- where Roman Catholic Bishops will celebrate Mass.

Also, for the first time at the bishop's meeting, the slate of 10 presidential candidates will include two Hispanic bishops.

Observers say the decision to hold the Monday afternoon service at a predominantly black parish in Baltimore reflects the bishops' interest in furthering the priorities of Pope Francis, who has said the church should be "a house of comfort" for all people.

"This is the first time in memory they're not holding that service in a cathedral or the largest church in the city," says Rocco Palmo, the editor of the insider blog Whispers in the Loggia. 

"Part of the formal business of this meeting will be really drilling in on a task force that has been working on the issue of 'peace in our communities.' As far as optics go, that's huge."

Palmo believes the decision reflects the priorities of DiNardo, who is known for working closely with African-American Catholics, a group of 4 million people Palmo says have at times felt marginalized within the church. (HELLO? Just try being a faithful Roman Catholic woman!)

And the inclusion of Jose H. Gomez, the archbishop of the Diocese of Los Angeles, and Daniel E. Flores, the bishop of Brownsville, Texas, among the presidential candidates, Palmo said, reflects a church embracing the influence of its rapidly growing Hispanic population.

The bishops nominate candidates during the summer preceding an election. The 10 who garner the most nominations are added to the slate.

Gomez, 65, and Flores, 55, have long emphasized church teaching on welcoming immigrants. Trump won a majority of Catholic voters, and the election, in part on promises to build the border wall, step up deportation of people in the country illegally, and cut federal funding to so-called sanctuary cities. (I plead with Roman Catholic Bishops and I'm assuming the Cardinals have some influence, to challenge this sinful policy.)

Bishops and priests are expected to remain above secular politics — their charge is to form consciences, not take up for candidates — but the contentious 2016 campaign drew some in.

(As a Roman Catholic woman, I  don't believe the above statement about supporting secular politics. The Roman Catholic Bishops are subject to political influence.)

In one incident that drew headlines, a parish in Southern California asserted in church bulletins that it's "a mortal sin to vote Democrat." Clinton and other Democrats support abortion rights; the church opposes abortion.

San Diego Bishop Robert McElroy sent a message to his 100 parishes that while church leaders are obligated to discuss how the teachings of the faith are relevant to public policy, they should eschew partisan politics.

"We must not and will not endorse specific candidates, use parish media or bulletins to favor candidates or parties through veiled language about selectively chosen issues, or engage in partisan political activity of any kind," McElroy wrote.

Archbishop Charles J. Chaput of Philadelphia drew criticism when he said Catholics, including Vice President Joe Biden, House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi and Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy — all supporters of abortion rights — had transferred their deepest loyalties from Catholic teaching to "the new 'church' of our ambitions and appetites.'"

National Catholic Reporter columnist Michael Sean Winters said Chaput's statements flew in the face of the recent admonition by Francis that church leaders should guard against being "argumentative or aggressive" in their ministries.

Chaput is one of a handful of perceived traditionalists on the presidential ballot. Others are Lori, who chairs the conference's Ad Hoc Committee on Religious Liberty, and Archbishop Allen Henry Vigneron of the Detroit Archdiocese. Perceived centrists such as Archbishops Gregory Aymond of New Orleans and Thomas Wenski of Miami are also on the slate.

The churchmen will cast their presidential votes Tuesday. The first candidate to gain a simple majority is to take over for current president Archbishop Joseph E. Kurtz of Louisville, Ky., at the close of business Thursday.

They'll then use the same method to elect the new vice president from the remaining nine names.

That leader will likely be the one to take over in 2019, at the end of a three-year term.

To Lori, there could be no better venue for choosing those leaders than the assembly, an event he says always concludes in a way that amplifies the values of the Catholic Church.

"Are there differences of opinion, legitimate differences of opinion, on many fronts? Certainly," Lori said. "But my experience is that the conference works very well together, that we are striving to embrace the priorities and the spirit of Pope Francis.

"This is not a conference that is against a lot of things. It's a conference that is for many good things. I think that whatever else happens next week, we'll be working very, very hard."

As a practicing Roman Catholic woman who probably risks sanctions for criticizing the US Bishops, I can't understand how the church can possibly justify the lack of support for Senator Tim Kaine. Shame on all of you! Your mothers taught you better!
jonathan.pitts@baltsun.com

As a practicing Roman Catholic, I believe the American Catholic Bishops must show leadership and stand up to the Donald Trump's draconian social policies, opposing Church social justice teachings about immigration, access to universal health care and opposing racism.

Obviously, the Bishops are ineffective in support of moral leadership.  I'm proud to challenge the American Roman Catholic Bishops to respond to this blog. Hugh Hewitt alert.