Americans Now Have A Real Leader in Secretary Robert Gates
"US Army Secretary Francis Harvey resigned amid a row over the treatment of wounded US soldiers (at US Walter Reed Army Hospital in Washington DC)."
I've updated this blog with the June 5, 2008 story about how Dr. Gates, Secretary of Defense (I've learned he has a doctorate in Russian History) fired the Secretary of the Air Force and the Joint Chiefs Air Force General for lacadadisical performance in overseeing our nation's nuclear arsenal.
"The stewardship of our nuclear deterrent is the most sensitive mission that we have," Gates said at a Pentagon news conference. "The declining standards . . . in my view required strong action."
(Therefore, I stand by my assertion: Secreatary Gates should be a Republican
presindential candidate!)
From CNN: Defense Secretary Robert Gates cites errors in caring for the nuclear arsenal. But experts see a more complicated dispute.
By Julian E. Barnes and Peter Spiegel, Los Angeles Times Staff Writers
June 6, 2008
WASHINGTON -- In an unprecedented action in a time of war, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates simultaneously fired the civilian and military leaders of the Air Force on Thursday, saying that oversight standards for the U.S. nuclear arsenal had deteriorated on their watch.
The immediate reason for the requested resignations of Gen. T. Michael "Buzz" Moseley, the Air Force chief of staff, and Air Force Secretary Michael W. Wynne was a report on the accidental shipment of nuclear triggers to Taiwan. However, the dismissals came amid a long-brewing dispute between Gates and the Air Force leadership.
The nuclear-trigger investigation -- led by Adm. Kirkland H. Donald, the military's senior official on nuclear safety matters -- found that the Air Force had failed to focus on its nuclear mission even after last year's high-profile incident in which a B-52 bomber crew unknowingly flew six nuclear warheads from North Dakota to Louisiana.
"The stewardship of our nuclear deterrent is the most sensitive mission that we have," Gates said at a Pentagon news conference. "The declining standards . . . in my view required strong action."
Gates was particularly disappointed that the Air Force had not taken significant steps to shore up its nuclear controls after the B-52 incident, said Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell. The nuclear weapons, on cruise missiles attached to the plane's wings, were not discovered missing from their repository at Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota for about 36 hours.
"If the Air Force had rectified this widespread cultural problem and taken the necessary corrective action after Minot, we would not be talking to you today," Morrell said. "A change in leadership would not have been necessary."
Gates said the dismissals were necessary because the Air Force began focusing on its nuclear problems only after the shipment to Taiwan was disclosed this year. In addition, he said, the Air Force had not been sufficiently critical of its past performance.
He acknowledged that problems in securing the nuclear arsenal go back more than a decade, but he added that the current leadership should have recognized and corrected them. He appointed a task force led by James R. Schlesinger, Defense secretary under President Ford, to recommend improvements in the oversight of nuclear weapons.
Gates said the dismissals of Wynne and Moseley were based solely on Donald's report, which he received last week. The report is classified, but officials briefed on the findings said it was highly critical of Air Force handling of nuclear technology.
The parts shipped to Taiwan included four electrical fuses used to trigger a nuclear weapon aboard U.S. missiles. The fuses were shipped to Taiwan by the Defense Logistics Agency, but the Air Force provided the fuses.
The fuses were sent to Taiwan in 2006. The mistake went undetected until March of this year.
A senior defense official, who requested anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss personnel moves, said the Air Force's failures in nuclear oversight were sufficient to merit the dismissals. He also acknowledged that the report was just the latest in a series of incidents that have raised questions about Air Force leadership.
Gates has been critical of Air Force officials' calls to build more F-22 fighter jets, an advanced but expensive plane. He also has been frustrated over what he sees as insufficient deployment of unmanned aerial vehicles over Iraq and Afghanistan.
Loren Thompson, a defense policy analyst at the Lexington Institute in Arlington, Va., said although the "formal reason" for Moseley's and Wynne's departure was the Taiwan shipment, the forced resignations were actually the result of a growing "accumulation of grievances."
"In the end, what it came down to is the feeling of the secretary of the Defense that the Air Force just wasn't on the policy page he was on, that it was pursuing its own policies," said Thompson, who is close to Air Force officials.
Officers have watched with frustration as Gates has delivered a series of speeches seen as critical of the Air Force. In their view, the service has made valuable contributions to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, including technology that allows ground troops to see full-motion videos shot from Predator drones.
Air Force Lt. Col. Greg Harbin, who has worked closely with Moseley and Wynne, said the two men were very much focused on Iraq and Afghanistan.
"We have not done a good job telling our story," Harbin said. "But there should be no doubt these men were focused on the wars."
The senior defense official said Gates had replacements for the two men in mind, but wanted to take a few days to consider the candidates.
Air Force leaders are said to favor Gen. John D.W. Corley, the head of Air Combat Command, as Moseley's replacement. Other defense officials are supporting Gen. Norton A. Schwartz, head of Transportation Command. Schwartz, who flew C-130 cargo planes and other aircraft, is not part of the fighter-plane community that dominates the Air Force. He has extensive experience working with other services. Gen. Kevin P. Chilton, the head of Strategic Command, is seen as another possible candidate.
On Capitol Hill, Democrats praised Gates' quick action, saying it marked a significant change from the leadership of his predecessor, Donald H. Rumsfeld.
"Secretary Gates' focus on accountability is essential and had been absent from the office of the secretary of Defense for too long," said Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), head of the Senate Armed Services Committee.
Moseley and Wynne are the latest in a series of senior Pentagon leaders whom Gates has either forced out or failed to renominate during his 18 months at the Pentagon. Rumsfeld was widely criticized, particularly by Democrats, for not holding senior officials accountable for failures in the Iraq war.
"What we've discovered here is that, unlike Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary Gates has both a bark and a bite," Thompson said.
Even before Thursday's revelation of the damning report on nuclear weapons, Moseley's job was thought to be in jeopardy. In addition to the public spat over the F-22 and the unmanned drones, Moseley had been under investigation by the Pentagon's inspector general for his involvement in a $50-million contract that was improperly steered to a company with close ties to senior Air Force officials.
Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), a member of the Armed Services Committee who led the criticism of Moseley, said investigators with whom she had spoken described the general as "evasive with his answers" during the inquiry. She said she was pleased that Gates had pushed him out.
"Any rookie auditor would have realized that they had an incredibly bad odor coming from the very top," McCaskill, the former state auditor in Missouri, said in an interview.
In his resignation letter, Wynne said he had long been an advocate for accountability within the Pentagon, and as a result accepted his fate. Moseley's letter, by contrast, did not mention the nuclear incident and simply stated his intention to retire.
From my April 2007 Blog:
Three cheers for leadership at the US Defense Department! Hip! Hip! Hurray for the newly appointed leader, our Secretary of Defense Robert Gates.
In a bold but absolutely needed decision, Gates unilaterally took no prisoners in the face of US Army bureaucracy. He fired the General in charge of the US Army Veteran's Hospital at Walter Reed; he fired the freshly appointed and yet to be confirmed replacement because he heard from Veterans that the nominee was likely the root of the hospital's outpatient problems in the first place. Then, he even fired the President's appointed Secretary of the Army Harvey. Moreover, these actions were taken in time to steal the lead stories on all the Friday evening television news shows.
Thank you Secretary Gates. You are the leader this country is yearning for.
I'm sorry your leadership arrived so late in our efforts to win peace in Iraq.
"Our wounded soldiers and their families sacrificed much and they deserve the best we can offer," said Secretary of Defense Gates.
My husband is a US Navy Veteran of the Viet Nam War where he served two tours. Once, "in-country" with the Seabees in Chu-Lai; and back to the Gulf of Tonkin aboard the aircraft carrier USS Intrepid. Tonight, my husband said these stories about the shabby environment our brave US veteran soldiers are living in at out- patient clinics, while waiting for determinations about their active duty status, made him ashamed as an American. As a decorated and retired veteran of the Viet Nam War, this is a stunning statement from a career Navy man.
Public Television's "The News Hour with Jim Lehrer", heard Marine veteran and columnist Mark Shields says the reason this out-patient debacle is such a daunting problem is because the US military cannot discharge veterans, as they have done in past wars, because there aren't enough troops to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan. (http://tinyurl.com/2k7vcx)
In other words, wounded veterans cannot be summarily discharged for health reasons because they might need to return to the war when they've recovered. Therefore, the holding bins in the veterans' out-patient clinics are piling up with recovering active duty military who are bureaucratically jerked around for 18 months while somebody in the Pentagon decides what criteria to use regarding their discharges.
Those Pentagon power-jerkers should open a book called "Notes on Nursing" by British nurse Florence Nightingale (1820-1910) who cared for thousands of wounded English soldiers in the Crimean War (1854-1856). Nightingale wrote, "It may seem a strange principle to enunciate as the very first requirement in a Hospital that it should do the sick no harm. [1859]". It appears our veteran out-patient programs are doing emotional harm - degrading harm - by treating our veteran service men and women like cattle, instead of heroes.
Congratulations to Secretary Gates for exhibiting astounding leadership during a time when this attribute is sadly lacking.
Gates recognized the magnitude of the Walter Reed Army Hospital problem - it's about caring for those who care about us - our soldiers. This situation will undoubtedly reverberate into a bigger discussion with even bolder actions to change an apparently sick dynamic, endemic in our American government - i.e., indifference.
We cannot be indifferent to our veterans and their families, who are fighting and sacrificing in the War in Iraq on behalf of President Bush, who waged this war with no provocation; and again in the war against terrorism in Afghanistan, where the enemy is now regrouping to defeat us.
Does anybody in the Republican Party see Secretary Robert Gates as a Presidential Leader? Hello? Are there any alert Republicans out there? Look here - there's a leader here for you - and he's finally taking charge of the Pentagon.
I've updated this blog with the June 5, 2008 story about how Dr. Gates, Secretary of Defense (I've learned he has a doctorate in Russian History) fired the Secretary of the Air Force and the Joint Chiefs Air Force General for lacadadisical performance in overseeing our nation's nuclear arsenal.
"The stewardship of our nuclear deterrent is the most sensitive mission that we have," Gates said at a Pentagon news conference. "The declining standards . . . in my view required strong action."
(Therefore, I stand by my assertion: Secreatary Gates should be a Republican
presindential candidate!)
From CNN: Defense Secretary Robert Gates cites errors in caring for the nuclear arsenal. But experts see a more complicated dispute.
By Julian E. Barnes and Peter Spiegel, Los Angeles Times Staff Writers
June 6, 2008
WASHINGTON -- In an unprecedented action in a time of war, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates simultaneously fired the civilian and military leaders of the Air Force on Thursday, saying that oversight standards for the U.S. nuclear arsenal had deteriorated on their watch.
The immediate reason for the requested resignations of Gen. T. Michael "Buzz" Moseley, the Air Force chief of staff, and Air Force Secretary Michael W. Wynne was a report on the accidental shipment of nuclear triggers to Taiwan. However, the dismissals came amid a long-brewing dispute between Gates and the Air Force leadership.
The nuclear-trigger investigation -- led by Adm. Kirkland H. Donald, the military's senior official on nuclear safety matters -- found that the Air Force had failed to focus on its nuclear mission even after last year's high-profile incident in which a B-52 bomber crew unknowingly flew six nuclear warheads from North Dakota to Louisiana.
"The stewardship of our nuclear deterrent is the most sensitive mission that we have," Gates said at a Pentagon news conference. "The declining standards . . . in my view required strong action."
Gates was particularly disappointed that the Air Force had not taken significant steps to shore up its nuclear controls after the B-52 incident, said Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell. The nuclear weapons, on cruise missiles attached to the plane's wings, were not discovered missing from their repository at Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota for about 36 hours.
"If the Air Force had rectified this widespread cultural problem and taken the necessary corrective action after Minot, we would not be talking to you today," Morrell said. "A change in leadership would not have been necessary."
Gates said the dismissals were necessary because the Air Force began focusing on its nuclear problems only after the shipment to Taiwan was disclosed this year. In addition, he said, the Air Force had not been sufficiently critical of its past performance.
He acknowledged that problems in securing the nuclear arsenal go back more than a decade, but he added that the current leadership should have recognized and corrected them. He appointed a task force led by James R. Schlesinger, Defense secretary under President Ford, to recommend improvements in the oversight of nuclear weapons.
Gates said the dismissals of Wynne and Moseley were based solely on Donald's report, which he received last week. The report is classified, but officials briefed on the findings said it was highly critical of Air Force handling of nuclear technology.
The parts shipped to Taiwan included four electrical fuses used to trigger a nuclear weapon aboard U.S. missiles. The fuses were shipped to Taiwan by the Defense Logistics Agency, but the Air Force provided the fuses.
The fuses were sent to Taiwan in 2006. The mistake went undetected until March of this year.
A senior defense official, who requested anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss personnel moves, said the Air Force's failures in nuclear oversight were sufficient to merit the dismissals. He also acknowledged that the report was just the latest in a series of incidents that have raised questions about Air Force leadership.
Gates has been critical of Air Force officials' calls to build more F-22 fighter jets, an advanced but expensive plane. He also has been frustrated over what he sees as insufficient deployment of unmanned aerial vehicles over Iraq and Afghanistan.
Loren Thompson, a defense policy analyst at the Lexington Institute in Arlington, Va., said although the "formal reason" for Moseley's and Wynne's departure was the Taiwan shipment, the forced resignations were actually the result of a growing "accumulation of grievances."
"In the end, what it came down to is the feeling of the secretary of the Defense that the Air Force just wasn't on the policy page he was on, that it was pursuing its own policies," said Thompson, who is close to Air Force officials.
Officers have watched with frustration as Gates has delivered a series of speeches seen as critical of the Air Force. In their view, the service has made valuable contributions to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, including technology that allows ground troops to see full-motion videos shot from Predator drones.
Air Force Lt. Col. Greg Harbin, who has worked closely with Moseley and Wynne, said the two men were very much focused on Iraq and Afghanistan.
"We have not done a good job telling our story," Harbin said. "But there should be no doubt these men were focused on the wars."
The senior defense official said Gates had replacements for the two men in mind, but wanted to take a few days to consider the candidates.
Air Force leaders are said to favor Gen. John D.W. Corley, the head of Air Combat Command, as Moseley's replacement. Other defense officials are supporting Gen. Norton A. Schwartz, head of Transportation Command. Schwartz, who flew C-130 cargo planes and other aircraft, is not part of the fighter-plane community that dominates the Air Force. He has extensive experience working with other services. Gen. Kevin P. Chilton, the head of Strategic Command, is seen as another possible candidate.
On Capitol Hill, Democrats praised Gates' quick action, saying it marked a significant change from the leadership of his predecessor, Donald H. Rumsfeld.
"Secretary Gates' focus on accountability is essential and had been absent from the office of the secretary of Defense for too long," said Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), head of the Senate Armed Services Committee.
Moseley and Wynne are the latest in a series of senior Pentagon leaders whom Gates has either forced out or failed to renominate during his 18 months at the Pentagon. Rumsfeld was widely criticized, particularly by Democrats, for not holding senior officials accountable for failures in the Iraq war.
"What we've discovered here is that, unlike Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary Gates has both a bark and a bite," Thompson said.
Even before Thursday's revelation of the damning report on nuclear weapons, Moseley's job was thought to be in jeopardy. In addition to the public spat over the F-22 and the unmanned drones, Moseley had been under investigation by the Pentagon's inspector general for his involvement in a $50-million contract that was improperly steered to a company with close ties to senior Air Force officials.
Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), a member of the Armed Services Committee who led the criticism of Moseley, said investigators with whom she had spoken described the general as "evasive with his answers" during the inquiry. She said she was pleased that Gates had pushed him out.
"Any rookie auditor would have realized that they had an incredibly bad odor coming from the very top," McCaskill, the former state auditor in Missouri, said in an interview.
In his resignation letter, Wynne said he had long been an advocate for accountability within the Pentagon, and as a result accepted his fate. Moseley's letter, by contrast, did not mention the nuclear incident and simply stated his intention to retire.
From my April 2007 Blog:
Three cheers for leadership at the US Defense Department! Hip! Hip! Hurray for the newly appointed leader, our Secretary of Defense Robert Gates.
In a bold but absolutely needed decision, Gates unilaterally took no prisoners in the face of US Army bureaucracy. He fired the General in charge of the US Army Veteran's Hospital at Walter Reed; he fired the freshly appointed and yet to be confirmed replacement because he heard from Veterans that the nominee was likely the root of the hospital's outpatient problems in the first place. Then, he even fired the President's appointed Secretary of the Army Harvey. Moreover, these actions were taken in time to steal the lead stories on all the Friday evening television news shows.
Thank you Secretary Gates. You are the leader this country is yearning for.
I'm sorry your leadership arrived so late in our efforts to win peace in Iraq.
"Our wounded soldiers and their families sacrificed much and they deserve the best we can offer," said Secretary of Defense Gates.
My husband is a US Navy Veteran of the Viet Nam War where he served two tours. Once, "in-country" with the Seabees in Chu-Lai; and back to the Gulf of Tonkin aboard the aircraft carrier USS Intrepid. Tonight, my husband said these stories about the shabby environment our brave US veteran soldiers are living in at out- patient clinics, while waiting for determinations about their active duty status, made him ashamed as an American. As a decorated and retired veteran of the Viet Nam War, this is a stunning statement from a career Navy man.
Public Television's "The News Hour with Jim Lehrer", heard Marine veteran and columnist Mark Shields says the reason this out-patient debacle is such a daunting problem is because the US military cannot discharge veterans, as they have done in past wars, because there aren't enough troops to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan. (http://tinyurl.com/2k7vcx)
In other words, wounded veterans cannot be summarily discharged for health reasons because they might need to return to the war when they've recovered. Therefore, the holding bins in the veterans' out-patient clinics are piling up with recovering active duty military who are bureaucratically jerked around for 18 months while somebody in the Pentagon decides what criteria to use regarding their discharges.
Those Pentagon power-jerkers should open a book called "Notes on Nursing" by British nurse Florence Nightingale (1820-1910) who cared for thousands of wounded English soldiers in the Crimean War (1854-1856). Nightingale wrote, "It may seem a strange principle to enunciate as the very first requirement in a Hospital that it should do the sick no harm. [1859]". It appears our veteran out-patient programs are doing emotional harm - degrading harm - by treating our veteran service men and women like cattle, instead of heroes.
Congratulations to Secretary Gates for exhibiting astounding leadership during a time when this attribute is sadly lacking.
Gates recognized the magnitude of the Walter Reed Army Hospital problem - it's about caring for those who care about us - our soldiers. This situation will undoubtedly reverberate into a bigger discussion with even bolder actions to change an apparently sick dynamic, endemic in our American government - i.e., indifference.
We cannot be indifferent to our veterans and their families, who are fighting and sacrificing in the War in Iraq on behalf of President Bush, who waged this war with no provocation; and again in the war against terrorism in Afghanistan, where the enemy is now regrouping to defeat us.
Does anybody in the Republican Party see Secretary Robert Gates as a Presidential Leader? Hello? Are there any alert Republicans out there? Look here - there's a leader here for you - and he's finally taking charge of the Pentagon.
Labels: Defense Secretary, Walter Reed Army Hospital, William Gates
posted by Juliana L'Heureux | 4:49 PM
|
0 comments
