Donald Trump obsessed with reflecting pool fiasco caused by his inept management upstaging need for a cyclospora infectious disease response

 Another health crisis is being mismanaged on Trump’s watch

Echo opinion published in the Boston Globe by Renée Graham

On the day that the first two cyclospora deaths were announced, Donald Trump was preoccupied with his Washington DC Reflecting Pool fiasco.

Trump's incompetent administration recently spent more time talking about COVID-19 than it has about cyclosporiasis, the intestinal illness that’s become a growing threat to public health nationwide.

But about two weeks after Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the health and human services secretary, said that the food- and waterborne cyclospora parasite that causes explosive diarrhea was “under control,” Michigan on Monday announced the first two deaths from the illness.

When Kennedy made his declaration, more than 1,600 people in five states had gotten sick. Now there are more than 18,000 confirmed or suspected cases in more than 40 states. Shredded iceberg lettuce from Taylor Farms, a major produce distributor, has been cited as a probable source of the outbreak, leading to a recall.

But as usual, the Trump administration is looking backward instead of addressing the serious issues currently endangering this nation.

During a contentious CNN appearance on Sunday, Kennedy bickered with “State of the Union” co-anchor Dana Bash over this nation’s COVID response, as he pushed the Republicans’ obsessive attempts to blame Dr. Anthony Fauci, the former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, for everything that happened during the pandemic.

But not once during that interview did Kennedy mention cyclospora or its current outbreak, the largest in US history. (To be fair, Bash inexplicably never brought it up.) 

Instead it was a 20-minute barrage of Kennedy’s mendacious screeching about how constitutional rights were “completely dismantled” during the pandemic and that COVID vaccines harmed more children than they helped.

Like most Republicans, Kennedy has conveniently forgotten that Trump was president for most of the first year of the pandemic.

See this for what it is — another part of Trump’s obsession with erasing the mammoth failures of his first term. 

Trump's war on history includes his own history, from his 2020, presidential election loss to his incitement of the deadly Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection to the ways he underplayed COVID severity despite knowing early on just how devastating the respiratory illness would be.

Cyclosporiasis, which is not usually fatal, is not comparable to COVID. But again, Trump seems unconcerned with a national health crisis. Since the outbreak began in May, Donald Trump has barely mentioned the parasitic illness, and the announcement of the first two recorded deaths, in Michigan, which has seen more cases than any other state, did nothing to change that.

But Trump found lots of time to drag US Attorney Jeanine Pirro because last week she dropped the government’s case against a former Olympian who was falsely charged with vandalizing the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. In reality, that iconic pool was vandalized by the rushed and shoddy workmanship that Trump demanded and taxpayers paid for.

Now, we’re paying for this administration’s decision to curtail the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s partnership between states and the federal government to monitor foodborne illnesses, including cyclospora last year. Opportunistic illnesses and parasites may never have more opportunities to sicken millions than during the second Trump administration. Cyclospora may be just the beginning.

But there’s also this. With news of the first cyclospora deaths came a queasy echo from the not-so-distant COVID-19 pandemic.

On the Michigan Department of Health & Human Services webpage for “infectious disease outbreaks,” officials said that both people who died “had significant underlying health conditions that may have been impacted by cyclosporiasis and dehydration.”

Constant mentions of “underlying health conditions” were a staple of the COVID pandemic years, the inference being that healthy people had little to worry about. 

What went unspoken was that the elderly, disabled, and people with chronic illnesses were expendable.

That tracks with Kennedy’s alarming beliefs about autism, vaccines, and various health conditions. Like Trump with COVID, Kennedy has downplayed the cyclospora outbreak because he seems to believe that healthy people do not get sick.

Such skewed rhetoric smacks of eugenics, a corrupted mind-set that fosters the idea that not only do the strong survive, but that they alone, above all others, deserve to survive. But in a country where a majority of Americans have an underlying health condition, including young people, this pushes us closer to a public health catastrophe.

Despite its rapid spread, cyclosporiasis is not a pandemic. But several times during her interview with Kennedy, Bash repeatedly asked the secretary about how the Trump administration is preparing for “the next pandemic.”

Tellingly, Kennedy never answered her question.

Renée Graham is a Globe columnist.

It should be "Saturday Night Live" laughable to see "Gym-Jim Jordan" questioning Attorney Jack Smith. Sadly it is hypocrisy in real time

Echo opinion letter published in the South Florida Sun Sentinel newspaper:

The Republicans in Washington are pressuring the Department of Justice to charge former special counsel Jack Smith with perjury.

Congressman "Gym-Jim Jordan" accused of not reporting child abuse reported by members of the Ohio State University wrestling team. But he is accusing the attorney Jack Smith of perjury❓ File under YGTBK❗

Maine Writer:  So hypicritical! Rep "Gym Jim Jordan", the Ohio congressman who is under investigation for failing to report child abuse reported by members of the Ohio State Wrestling team, but now has the audacity to question the integrity of Jack Smith, who was the United States Department of Justice as an assistant US attorney.

To hear them tell it, Mr. Smith replied with a so-called half-truth to one of their questions. A first-year law school student knows that when a witness is questioned by an opposing attorney, a witness should answer truthfully. But the witness should respond only to the direct question being asked. Smith, who’s no stranger to courtroom testimony, did this.

Two things are obvious here. The person examining Smith- i.e., "Gym Jim Jordan", not only didn’t do his homework, but also didn’t have a clue on how to peel back the onion to get more information. 

Incompetence by the individual questioning Smith is the issue here — not Smith.

From: Scott Shampaner, in Coral Springs, Florida

Donald Trump and his failed maga stinking reflecting pool

https://www.latimes.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/story/2026-08-04/jeanine-pirro-reflecting-pool#:~:text=Readers%20fault%20President,to%20act%20independently.

Echo opinion letters published in the Los Angeles Times:

Cleaning up Donald Trump's stinking ugly "reflecting pool".
This story refuses to go away because it has become a metaphor about Donald Trump's stinking administration.

• Readers fault Donald Trump for insisting the Washington Reflecting Pool was sabotaged by left-wing vandals even after U.S. Atty. Jeanine Pirro blamed construction flaws, not criminal damage.
  
  
• Letters highlight Trump’s 💲14-million, no-bid contract to a Mar-a-Lago associate whose shoddy work allegedly led to false vandalism accusations and the arrest of an ultimately exonerated suspect.
• Correspondents question whether Trump will apologize, cover the accused man’s legal costs and explain his false claims, while challenging whether the Justice Department can be trusted to act independently.

To the editor: U.S. Atty. Jeanine Pirro dropped charges against a man who was accused of vandalism to the Washington DC Reflecting Pool, saying the damage was caused by shoddy workmanship, not by vandalism (“Trump blasts Pirro after she refutes his claim that Reflecting Pool was damaged by vandals,” Aug. 1). But, Donald Trump, defending his renovation, is angry at Pirro, insisting without evidence that the damage was caused by left-wing vandals.

Pirro is in big trouble. Doesn’t she realize that, in Trump’s world, 2+2=5❓

From: Richard Merel, in Hermosa Beach, California

To the editor: So Trump awarded a 💲14-million, no-bid Reflecting Pool contract to his Mar-a-Lago buddy, who botched that contract’s work. Then, in an attempt to deflect responsibility, Trump and his cult minions claimed that the contractor’s work was good but that vandals had subsequently sabotaged it. David Hearn was arrested and charged with vandalism. Finally, Trump’s Department of Justice dropped that vandalism charge when it became apparent that it wouldn’t survive trial discovery.

Will Trump apologize to Mr. Hearn and reimburse his legal expenses❓ Will Trump explain to everyone why he wildly claimed Reflecting Pool sabotage❓ Can America trust Trump’s DOJ when it clearly acts in personal fealty to him❓

Frankly, I’m afraid that we already know those answers.

From Brian Roberts, in Covina, California

Donald Trump and maga Republicans are creating a fascist state with ICE as the 21st century Gestaopo

Gestapo was the official secret state police of Nazi Germany, founded in April 1933, by Hermann Göring, and later led by Heinrich Himmler and Reinhard Heydrich. 👿

With ICE, America is becoming the country we created in Iraq
The tactics the United States used in Iraq are migrating home.

Opinion published in the Boston Globe:

Thomas E. Ricks is the author of two books about the Iraq War, “Fiasco” and “The Gamble.” His most recent work is “Big Money, Small Town,” a novel set in Maine.

Every time an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent kills a person in our streets, I think back to something that a Middle Easterner said just before the American invasion of Iraq in 2003: “You Americans think you are going to change us to be more like you,” he predicted, “but I think the Middle East is going to change you to be more like us.”

I didn’t really believe it at the time. Frankly, I thought America was too resilient for that, with a good track record of observing human rights and bolstering democracy. 

But that prescient observation still haunts me more than two decades later. Unfortunately, that passing voice was right.

Over the past two years, the way the US Army often mistreated Iraqis has come home to roost — ICE personnel have invaded our cities, acting just as reckless and lawless as our troops abroad once did. There are armed men in the streets, outfitted in goggles, masks, helmets, and body armor, ill-prepared for the tasks at hand but possessing an overwhelming arrogance about how to perform those tasks. They point their weapons at unarmed people and shout obscenities at them. They answer to no one that we can see, and they shroud their actions in an overarching excuse: They can shoot if they feel threatened.

In some ways, they behave worse than did the American troops who blundered around the streets of Baghdad. Those soldiers had little other ways to communicate than gestures, because very few of them spoke Arabic. By contrast, ICE agents often speak the same language as the people they victimize. 

But, having a common tongue is not always de-escalatory. In Minneapolis last January, after ICE agent

Jonathan Ross killed Renee Good with three shots, he called her a profane slur.

Another difference in Iraq is that when American troops acted brutally, they were investigated by their own superiors. In November 2005, for example, when Marines killed 25 unarmed civilians in the western Iraqi town of Haditha, one of them a baby, officers in the chain of command began to ask questions.

Those Marines were acquitted, but the Haditha incident came to mark a turning point in the war. It forced top American commanders in Iraq to reexamine their tactics and strategy and begin to focus on protecting the civilian population.

This in turn led to changes on the ground that eventually permitted the United States to withdraw from Iraq, not quite claiming a victory but neither leaving in a pell-mell retreat.

And that change in Iraq, overdue and difficult, may be the biggest difference between then and now. 

There is no evidence that Trump administration officials are going to step back, recalculate, and reform. 

Indeed, they show no impulse even to investigate why unarmed people are being killed in our streets by government agents.

Rather, the president and his subordinates seem quite satisfied with having masked men terrorize the population, especially in cities that don’t support him politically. In some cases, these men are the same veterans who served abroad: ICE agent Ross, the Minneapolis shooter, was a machine gunner in Iraq, while David Brouillette, the trigger puller in Biddeford, Maine, served in Afghanistan in a military intelligence unit. One can only wonder just what lessons those men brought home from their combat tours — and how many more ICE agents are like them.

This bleak conclusion leads me to one more parallel with the Iraq war: It is indeed time for regime change here. Just as Iraq needed to move on from living under an authoritarian, law-breaking ruler and his corrupt circle, so do we.

A final thought: Every war, even bad ones, has its heroes. The people who stand out to me now are the volunteers who monitor the actions of ICE agents and sometimes have guns and tasers brandished at them in return. These are the people who truly are fighting for our freedoms. We are in their debt.

Senator Susan Collins was advised by thousands of Maine constituents and Planned Parenthood to oppose the Kavanaugh nomination

She Voted for a Justice Who Overturned Roe. Now it Haunts Her on the Trail.  Published in The New York Times by Lisa Lerer and Beth Reinhard. 

Senator Susan Collins and Judge Kavanaugh

Senator Susan Collins, who claims to support abortion rights, endorsed Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination for the Supreme Court. It has emerged as a major issue in her campaign for re-election. She Voted for a Justice Who Overturned Roe. Now it Haunts Her on the Trail.

Senator Susan Collins, who claims she supports abortion rights, endorsed Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination for the Supreme Court. It has emerged as a major issue in her campaign for re-election.

Of the more than 10,000 votes cast by Senator Susan Collins of Maine, there is one that has shadowed her like no other as she runs for a sixth term.

On Oct. 6, 2018, Collins, one of only two Senate Republicans who support abortion rights, cast a deciding vote to confirm Brett M. Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court. 

Four years later, Justice Kavanaugh voted with the conservative majority to overturn Roe v. Wade, which had guaranteed a constitutional right to abortion for nearly half a century.

The vote cut against her well-cultivated reputation as a moderate Republican who is unafraid to break ranks. 

Also, it put her at odds with abortion rights activists, who had previously backed her campaigns, and with advocates for victims of sexual violence, who rallied behind a woman who accused Mr. Kavanaugh of sexual assault, an allegation he denied.

Now, Collins’s support for Justice Kavanaugh has become a major issue in her first re-election campaign since Roe was overturned, a race that could swing control of the Senate. The 2018, vote has emerged as a character test of Collins for Maine voters: Some consider her a principled lawmaker taking tough votes, while others see a calculating politician determined to keep her job. (IOW Senator Susan Collins has gone all maga. She is a maga diva❗)

Publicly, Senator Collins appears unbowed. “I do not regret that vote,” she told reporters in Portland in June. 

Moreover, she went even further after an event at a fire station in the small town of Randolph, Maine, this month.

“I would vote for him again, yes,” she said, according to audio acquired by an operative for American Bridge, a major Democratic super PAC.

But people who interacted with her during the Kavanaugh hearings say Senator Collins still harbors frustrations about the continued backlash after a confirmation process she described in 2018, as “more like a caricature of a gutter-level political campaign.”

Even as she was accused of capitulating to the demands of her party and President Trump, Ms. Collins believed she took the more politically difficult vote while representing a Democratic-leaning state, she told a confidant at the time. And in the years since, she has appeared to hold grudges against people who criticized her vote.

“She takes all of it very personally,” said Dana Singiser, a former Planned Parenthood vice president, who raised concerns about  Kavanaugh with Collins during his confirmation process. “For us, it’s not really personal, it’s just about our mission. Collins was an abortion-defining vote.”

This account is based on interviews with more than two dozen former aides, Senate colleagues, activists and others involved in the confirmation process. Some spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations.

Collins declined an interview request from The New York Times. Blake Kernen, a spokeswoman for Collins, dismissed criticism of the senator’s vote as driven by “hyperpartisan voices.”

“Senator Collins fully and honestly explained her decision in the days before and the years that followed Justice Kavanaugh’s nomination,” she said.

Ms. Kernen also drew a contrast between the senator, who she said “has always been pro-choice,” and her Democratic opponent, Troy Jackson, who opposed abortion as a state lawmaker until about a decade ago.

Senator Troy Jackson opposed abortion as a state lawmaker until about a decade ago and then went on to help enact a Maine law that is one of the most permissive in the country.

Later, however, he helped enact a Maine law that allows abortion at any stage of pregnancy, as long as a doctor deems it necessary — one of the most permissive in the country.

Collins’s allies say she made a principled decision to back Judge Kavanaugh after extensive research, including hours of conversations with him, scrutiny of his work and feedback from thousands of constituents. (As a Maine constituent, I do not believe Senator Collins listened to her constituents who clearly advised her to oppose the Kavanaugh nomination. Instead, she ignored us.)

In the end, they say, her vote came down to a simple calculation: She believed Judge Kavanaugh when he said he would respect precedent, which she interpreted to mean that he would leave Roe v. Wade largely intact. And she did not believe Christine Blasey Ford, the California professor who said he sexually assaulted her when they were in high school.

“She did her job,” said Mike Davis, who helped spearhead Justice Kavanaugh’s confirmation as chief nominations counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee’s chairman. “She did her homework.”

(OMG❗ 🤥Sentor Collins only did enough "homework" to cover her pre-determined vote. She ignored advice from thousands of her constituents who petitioned her to oppose Kavanaugh's nomination. Ms. Blasey Ford testified to the Senate under oath.)

But what she saw as a conscientious vote provoked years of protests from Capitol Hill to her home in Maine. 

As the years progressed, she grew irritated by liberals continuing to vilify her support for Justice Kavanaugh while failing to acknowledge her support for the three justices nominated by Democratic presidents, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

“It is a major source of frustration for Senator Collins that while there seems to be an endless discussion about the Kavanaugh confirmation, there is never any mention that she is the only Republican senator to have voted to confirm all three,” said Stephen Diamond, a Maine attorney who helped her prepare for the Kavanaugh confirmation hearing.

Ms. Kernen defended Senator Collins’s record on abortion rights, noting that a Maine affiliate of Planned Parenthood commended her in 2025, for opposing Republican efforts to defund the organization. And she pointed to legislation that Ms. Collins introduced in 2022 that she said would codify abortion rights into federal law.

But the senator voted against a broader Democratic measure preferred by advocates for abortion rights, saying it was championed by “far-left activists.”

Kay Rand, who served as chief of staff for Senator Angus King, a Maine independent who caucuses with Democrats, said the vote shifted views of Ms. Collins in Maine, even as she handily won re-election in 2020.

“It’s just never been the same for her since the Kavanaugh vote,” said Ms. Rand, who worked for Mr. King during the Kavanaugh hearings. “It was a lightning rod, a galvanizing issue.”

A clear litmus test:  Even before Donald Trump unveiled his pick to replace retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy on the Supreme Court, Senator Collins issued a clear litmus test: She would not support any judge who demonstrated “hostility” to Roe v. Wade.

With Judge Kavanaugh, who sat on a federal appeals court and had worked in the George W. Bush White House, the Trump administration believed it had found a nominee who could satisfy Senator Collins, a pivotal swing vote at a time when Republicans held a single-seat majority.

The nomination was announced in July 2018, and Senator Collins began preparing for a fraught confirmation process. Her approach, she has said, is to defer to the White House on judicial selections as long as the nominees are qualified and within the legal mainstream.

(OMG❗This is such a lie.🤥 In fact, Senator Collins supported the nomination of RFKjr, after hundreds of Maine constituents, all with medical credentials, hand delivered to her a signed letter requesting her to oppose the clearly unqualified RFKjr.)

She put together a team of five lawyers to help her learn all she could about the nominee, recalled Mr. Diamond, who had previously served as Ms. Collins’s legislative director and joined the team. The nonpartisan Congressional Research Service offered 10 hours of briefings covering Judge Kavanaugh’s significant opinions, speeches and articles. Ms. Collins attended all the sessions, Mr. Diamond said.

She also had a two-hour meeting in her Capitol Hill office with the nominee himself. When she emerged, Ms. Collins told reporters they had discussed abortion cases “at length,” and that Mr. Kavanaugh said he agreed with Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who said during his 2005, confirmation hearings that he regarded Roe as “settled law.”

Mr. Diamond left the meeting with a similar impression.

“I am pro-choice and I came away with the conclusion that there was a reasonable possibility that he would not overturn Roe, though maybe modify it around the edges,” he said.

Abortion rights advocates viewed the senator’s statements as naïve or willfully ignorant. A year earlier, Judge Kavanaugh had dissented from a high-profile decision that allowed a 17-year-old detainee in an immigration facility to receive an abortion, a notable position given his limited record on the issue. He argued that the decision created a new right for “immediate abortion on demand,” adopting the political language of the anti-abortion movement.

The day after her meeting with Judge Kavanaugh, Ms. Collins reassured Julia McDonald, a Maine physician who performed abortions, that she had asked the nominee “hard questions” about his view of Roe and she believed his commitment to stare decisis, the legal doctrine that directs courts to follow precedent-setting cases.

“Those of us in that meeting pushed back hard, asking how she could believe that from a man with his record,” said Dr. McDonald, who met with Ms. Collins in her office alongside two patients, another doctor and a Planned Parenthood representative. “She was not interested in hearing our concerns. It seemed very clear that she had made up her mind.”

At times, Ms. Collins seemed focused on smaller issues. In two meetings with Planned Parenthood leaders, she complained that Colby College students had distracted from her May commencement address — before Judge Kavanaugh was even nominated — by wearing “I stand with Planned Parenthood” stickers, according to people present in the meetings.

The activists were taken aback by the senator’s remarks, given the stakes of the confirmation fight. To the Planned Parenthood leaders, the stickers were not antagonistic: Less than a year earlier, the organization had honored Senator Collins.

Escalating pressure:  By early September 2018, Senator Collins was feeling the brunt of the escalating pressure on the few undecided senators. 

Agitated and sometimes crude callers besieged her offices. About 3,000 coat hangers arrived by mail, stark reminders about the time before Roe. v. Wade, when desperate women used hangers to try to end unwanted pregnancies. 

Protesters stood outside her home, wearing red robes and white bonnets like the characters in Margaret Atwood’s dystopian novel, “The Handmaid’s Tale.”

There were also violent threats, including a fax from someone promising to slit her throat and sever her limbs if she voted for Judge Kavanaugh. One man ambushed her outside her home in Washington in the rain after she arrived from work late at night.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration mounted its own pressure campaign. Mr. Davis, a lawyer for the Senate Judiciary Committee, recalled warning Ms. Collins about one scenario that he said did give her pause: Judge Amy Coney Barrett, who had been promoted by abortion opponents, was likely next on the president’s shortlist.

“Judge Kavanaugh was seen as our best hope of preserving Roe,” Mr. Diamond, the former Collins staffer, said.

Then on September 16, the confirmation process took a dramatic turn. The Washington Post reported that Dr. Ford had accused Judge Kavanaugh of pinning her down on a bed, groping her, and attempting to pull off her bathing suit at a high school party in the 1980s. She said he covered her mouth with his hand to muffle her screams.

Judge Kavanaugh denied what he called “false accusations.”

Ms. Collins immediately pushed for both Dr. Ford and Justice Kavanaugh to testify under oath. She told reporters she was “appalled” when the president attempted to undermine Dr. Ford on social media.

Hours after Dr. Ford’s testimony, Tamara Field, a freelance journalist from Camden, Maine, traveled with about 20 other women on an overnight bus to Washington, D.C., hoping to urge Ms. Collins in person to reject the nomination.

Sitting in Ms. Collins’s office, Ms. Field recounted being sexually assaulted on a first date just a few months earlier. Ms. Collins hugged her and thanked her for sharing her story, she said, but Ms. Field felt in her gut that the senator was leaning toward supporting Judge Kavanaugh.

Years later, she still feels betrayed.

“Susan Collins can look somebody in the eye and tell them how sorry she is that they were attacked and then vote for a man that probably in my opinion committed sexual assault,” Ms. Field said. “There’s a duplicity to her.”

As Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination advanced through the Senate Judiciary Committee, Ms. Collins joined calls from Jeff Flake, then a Republican senator of Arizona, for an F.B.I. investigation of Dr. Ford’s allegations — and a one-week delay in the confirmation process.

Mr. Flake recalled eating dinner with Senator Collins that evening, along with Sen. Lisa Murkowski, a moderate Republican from Alaska. The mood was tense.

“I know the vote was weighing on her,” said Mr. Flake, who described “massive” pressure from both sides of the political spectrum. “There were obviously death threats to me and my family and to her. This was a tough time.”

Ms. Collins continued her research, spending time in the secure room where the F.B.I.’s investigative materials into the case were stored. She contacted friends of the judge to ask if they could imagine him doing anything like this, speaking to former colleagues including former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. George W. Bush called twice to lobby her personally. 

(As a Maine constituent, I attribute the friendship Senator Collins enjoyed with the very supportive family of President George Herbert Walker Bush as giving her the okay to support Kavanaugh. In fact, she even put a picture on Facebook with her visiting the former president George Herbert Walker Bush, in Kennebunkport, just a few weeks before the senate vote when she announced her support for Kavanaugh.)

“She put the Senate judiciary staff through the wringer,” Mr. Davis recalled. “She was in a league of her own in terms of the level of scrutiny and attention to detail.”

A Republican ‘star’:  By the time Ms. Collins was ready to announce her decision on October 5, few knew for certain what she would say. Ms. Murkowski, the only other Senate Republican who favored abortion rights, had announced she would vote against Judge Kavanaugh. So had Senator Heidi Heitkamp, a Democrat from the red state of North Dakota. The three women had kept in close contact during the process, discussing the claims, testimony and evidence.

Ms. Collins stepped behind the lectern on the Senate floor and launched into a point-by-point defense of Judge Kavanaugh.

She described the future justice as “more of a centrist.” She
was confident he would uphold the Affordable Care Act’s health insurance protections for pre-existing medical conditions and the federal right to an abortion. And she was convinced he would serve as a check on presidential power.

“My fervent hope is that Brett Kavanaugh will work to lessen the divisions in the Supreme Court so that we have far fewer 5-4 decisions and so that public confidence in our judiciary and our highest court is restored,” she said.

Though Ms. Collins described Dr. Ford’s testimony as “sincere, painful and compelling,” the senator said her allegation did not meet a “more likely than not” standard.

Twenty-four hours later, she cast her vote for Justice Kavanaugh.

“I do not believe that Brett Kavanaugh was her assailant,” she said in a CNN interview that aired shortly after the vote. “I do believe that she was assaulted. I don’t know by whom. I’m not certain when.”

Lisa Banks, one of the attorneys who represented Dr. Ford, called the notion that she had misidentified her attacker “preposterous,” in a recent interview. She added, “If Senator Collins had questions or wanted to speak directly with Dr. Ford about her experience and allegations, Dr. Ford would have gladly done so.”

Senator Collins’s fellow Republicans hailed her as a hero. Donald Trump praised her effusively and dubbed her a “star.” 

Leonard Leo, the conservative megadonor credited with helping Mr. Trump build the court’s conservative majority, held a fund-raiser for Senator Collins at his Maine home the following year.

The event drew picketers, which Senator Collins called “just ridiculous, absolutely ridiculous,” according to a Bloomberg reporter.

Three years later, in the hours after Roe fell, protests exploded across the nation. Senator Collins felt compelled to defend her decision-making process.

She took the unusual step of releasing private notes from her meeting with Judge Kavanaugh in which he talked about his respect for court precedent. “I feel misled,” Ms. Collins said then. Lance Dutson, a Maine Republican and a former campaign aide to Ms. Collins, said the senator should not be blamed for Justice Kavanaugh’s decision. She did her research, was transparent with her constituents and made the best decision she could at the time, he said.

“She took a Supreme Court nominee’s word,” he said. “From the information she got, she felt comfortable voting for him, and things went the other way after the fact.”

The senator’s unease over criticism of her vote lingered. 

In a 2021 phone conversation, she confronted a Biden administration nominee who had criticized her support for Judge Kavanaugh on social media. Ms. Collins described those posts as “nasty” and implied that the remarks disqualified the candidate for the position, according to a person familiar with the confirmation process. The nominee was later confirmed, without Ms. Collins’s vote.

The senator’s support for Justice Kavanaugh effectively ended her relationship with Planned Parenthood, the country’s largest provider of reproductive health care. In 2017, the organization had honored Ms. Collins for opposing Republican efforts to cut its funding. Three years later, it endorsed her Democratic opponent.

In 2021, as Ms. Singiser was cleaning out her desk at Planned Parenthood, she discovered an artifact of the old relationship: Posters printed before the Kavanaugh confirmation that read, “I stand with Susan Collins.”

“I thought, ‘If she does something really great we’re going to use them,’” said Ms. Singiser, who now advises reproductive rights organizations. “And then, she never did anything great for us.”

Hi, I spent weeks digging into how Susan Collins made her decision on whether to support Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court with my colleague Beth Reinhard. The vote has become a Rorschach test for how some voters view Sen. Collins's character. What do you all think❓ (Maine Writer- I think this is an excellent article. Thank you.)