Democrats must create a new period of Reconstruction after Donald Trump and maga Republicans are voted out of office
In it I refer, as I often do, to the Reconstruction period of American history — the roughly 10 to 15 years following the end of the Civil War — as inspiration for how Democrats might approach that task.
In particular, the Radical Republicans who spearheaded the most far-reaching attempts to reconstruct the South embraced a constitutional vision rooted in the broad authority of Article I of the Constitution. Part of this was by necessity. After Abraham Lincoln’s assassination in April 1865, they had to contend with President Andrew Johnson, a vicious white supremacist who opposed Black civil rights and sought a speedy end to Reconstruction so that he might build a new political party on a Jacksonian vision of white supremacy. They also had to contend with a Supreme Court that saw itself as a bulwark for a narrow and restrictive vision of the Constitution.
The leading congressmen of the period had their own conception of the relationship between Congress, the presidency, and the courts — shaped in large part by their battles with the slave power.
Here I want to highlight two things about the way congressional supremacy worked.
First, is that the Reconstruction Congress rejected the Supreme Court’s authority to invalidate its legislation. It was Congress — representing the entire people — that had the right and authority to say what the Constitution meant and it was the duty of the Supreme Court to enforce that meaning on the states.
As I wrote, should Democrats have control of the White House and both branches of Congress in 2029, they will be faced with a project of reconstruction, not restoration. You could do worse in those circumstances than to ask: What would Charles Sumner do❓What would Thaddeus Stevens do❓ What would John Bingham do❓
They wouldn’t stand by and allow their project to be destroyed by the hostile forces arrayed against them. They would look to the Constitution which, for all of its flaws, gives Congress the power and authority to make its vision reality.
If this is all true, and it is, then any plausible response to Project 2025, must include a larger vision for the future of the American Republic. A Project 2029, cannot be a collection of Democratic Party agenda items. It must articulate a broad new conception (aka, a new Lazarus❗) of the nation’s political order — one that will guide the way a future Democratic-led government might wield power.
Labels: Abraham Lincoln, Jamelle Bouie, Radical Republicans, The New York Times












